Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

Links Provided!

Pat,

As I've stated before you LIE so much you cannot remember fiction from reality. What really surprises me is you already asked for links before and I already provided it. But so everyone can see what a liar you are I'll prove it again.

I stated: "Pat what you need to do is provide detailed, documented proof that these beliefs of yours i.e. people cannot hear differences in either a) wires in an intelligently designed audio system or b) between properly designed audio components that are functioning correctly, are scientifically supported."

To which you untruthfully responded at the link given Since I do not make those claims, I have no obligation whatever to defend them.
http://db.audioasylum.com/cgi/m.mpl?forum=prophead&n=26303&highlight=obligation+Pat+D&r=&session=

So I found where you responded to a post I made: In regards to your untrute comment that you do not make those claims, thus you have no obligation whatever to defend them. Pat you most certainly did make those claims! In fact in your post to regmac you said: "As I've been saying, we can't say cables make no difference under any circumstances since audible differences have been proven under some circumstances--only as you say, those circumstances aren't likely in an intelligently put together audiophile system. Which is exactly what I've (Pat D) been saying."
http://db.audioasylum.com/cgi/m.mpl?forum=prophead&n=26367&highlight=obligation+Pat+D&session=

So first we have Pat D-Cake untruthfully claiming: Since I do not make those claims, I have no obligation whatever to defend them. Yet in a post I found we have Pat D-Cake admitting Which is exactly what I've (Pat D) been saying. So how can we trust anything you say when you'll lie about not saying things you've posted and can be documented? This is just one of your many dirty tricks Pat.

Now of course you're Pat D and lying comes so easy for you, so I'm sure you'll try to lie your way out of this proof as well. Afterall you have your 10 dirty tactics and 4 modes of operation to help you out. So what will it be this time?

Will you...

1) Claim he's being misquoted?
2) Claim he's being quoted out of context?
3) Claim he's misunderstood?
4) Claim he's being attacked, deceived or tricked etc?
5) Claim his opponent doesn't think logically?
6) Claim his opponent said things they didn't actually say?
7) Claim he's never said something when proof is available he did

(Pat's logic is if you didn't quote him word-for-word he didn't say what you wrote! But if you do quote him word-for-word he'll claim either 1, 2, 3 or 4 above. Either way Pat has a way out.)

8) Switch the actual topic to what he wants to debate
9) Blame others of doing the things he does
10) Make untrue claims (lie?)
11)Ignore the questions he's asked

Like you did when you LIED and claimed you knew I never listened to your speakers?

Pat you really need to develop an ounce of integrity and stop telling all these LIES which as so easy to prove you've told.

Thetubeguy1954


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Schiit Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.