In Reply to: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. posted by Pat D on November 16, 2006 at 14:36:53:
Hi Pat,I don't know why you'd find it strange that I'd take HP's word for the sound quality of the 47 Labs component. I explained to you that in the past when I was able to audition components HP had reviewed, more often I agreed than disagreed with his assessment of those components. So considering that, chances are most likely I'd agree with his assessment again. It's not a 100% certainty, but it's more likely than not. Then of course one needs to consider that:
1) HP auditioned the component on a group of very well respected components
2) My beliefs and preferences in audio are closer to HP's than they are to yours.So yes I trusted HP's assessment of the 47 Labs component over yours. That of course could change if I heard it myself and disagreed with HP's assessment, but until that happens, I'll give his opinion the benefit of the doubt. That's really not much different than when you said I have to take JA's word for it, is it? You'll accept JA's word about how the 47 Lab measures, but it's strange if I accept HP's word about how the 47 Labs sounds? IMHO you're doing the same thing I am, just in a different area about the 47 Lab component.
====================================================================
Our differences beliefs and preferences in audio is brought into light by what you said in the last paragraph of your post. I don't personally believe your Paradigm Signature S2 speakers are first class. When I did a direct comparison with the Aliante Pinafarina Ones I found the Aliante's to be considerably better and I don't even believe the Aliante's are first class. Which is why I am restoring the RCA LC9A's!Now as far as John Atkinson, Andrew Marshall, and Doug Schneider being considered "excellent speaker reviewers" like you said they are. I have to tell you Pat that I have serious doubts in that area as well. If they really believe the Paradigm Signature S2 speakers are worthy of Class A Restricted LF status in Stereophile's Recommended Components list. I find their judgement to be quite suspect. Pat I understand there a degrees within a given Class of audio components, just like 90-100 is A in school. However in Stereophile's own words Class A components must have, which means this MUST define the Paradigm Sig. S2s, "The best attainable sound for a component of it's kind, almost without practical considerations; "the least musical compromise. A Class A system is one for which you don't have to make a leap of faith to believe you are hearing the real thing. Sorry but that doesn't describe the Paradigm Sig. S2s at all. I've heard the Paradigm Sig. S2, they're not a bad speaker, but they are hardly capable of producing the best attainable sound for a component of it's kind, almost without practical considerations. They don't respresent the least musical compromise in speakers, nor did they replicate music wherein I didn't have to make a leap of faith to believe I am hearing the real thing either. Even the Aliante's were considerably better and I don't even think they should honestly be rated Class A. Not when there are other 2-way monitor-type speakers like the Magico Mini or some of the more expensive Sonus Fabers and that's only looking at monitor type. Think of how many floor standing speakers fit into this catagory as well and you'll see why I don't find the 2-way, monitor-type Paradigm Sig S2 worthy of being in Class A, even when the Restricted LF status is added.
Pat it's not meant as a slight, I'm not including my speakers here either. If you honestly believe your Paradigm Sig. S2s are capable of the best attainable sound for a component of it's kind, almost without practical onsiderations and provide you with the least musical compromise of all speakers that are of restricted LF status, so be it! But if that's the case you must be fairly well convinced you're hearing live music when you turn your system on, because a Class A system is one for which you don't have to make a leap of faith to believe you are hearing the real thing, or say JA says.
I am in 100% complete agreement that there are a number of interesting speakers designs out there. Like you, I would like to audition many of them. Like you said, Why shouldn't I? The the Summa doesn't intrigue me and the Orion would require too many extra amps, wires, etc for me to be seriously interested in them, although I'd still like to hear them someday. Pat I am only stating my opinion, please don't get defensive, ok? Like you or someone else here once told me, not agreeing with you is not the same as attacking you.
Keep enjoying the music -- Thetubeguy1954
It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows. - Epictetus
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - thetubeguy1954 06:55:42 11/17/06 (33)
- Re: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - Pat D 12:28:56 11/17/06 (32)
- Re: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - thetubeguy1954 13:41:43 11/17/06 (31)
- Re: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - Pat D 15:32:36 11/17/06 (30)
- Re: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - thetubeguy1954 09:19:20 11/20/06 (29)
- Re: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - Pat D 09:32:10 11/21/06 (28)
- OK Pat, But I Did Compare the Aliantes vs The Paradigm. - thetubeguy1954 11:36:55 11/21/06 (27)
- Re: OK Pat, But I Did Compare the Aliantes vs The Paradigm. - Pat D 14:48:57 11/21/06 (26)
- Re: OK Pat, But I Did Compare the Aliantes vs The Paradigm. - thetubeguy1954 08:16:42 11/22/06 (25)
- You keep on making up opinions and motives for me. I thought you were giving that up . . . - Pat D 21:29:04 11/22/06 (24)
- That's YOUR Interpretation, It's Not What I Said or Meant. - thetubeguy1954 13:20:10 11/27/06 (23)
- Nope! At this point I can read you like a book. (nt) - Pat D 15:38:17 11/27/06 (22)
- Pat You Believe You Can Read Me Just Like The Book Called War & Peace, After You've Read The Comic Book Version. - thetubeguy1954 09:39:21 11/29/06 (21)
- You haven't even heard the Sonus Faber Cremon Auditor - Pat D 10:56:13 11/29/06 (20)
- Nor Have I Ever Claimed To! - thetubeguy1954 13:20:07 11/29/06 (19)
- No, but you compare the SF Cremona Auditor to other speakers! - Pat D 15:00:49 11/29/06 (18)
- And I've Told You How & Why I did That Many Times Now... - thetubeguy1954 09:48:37 11/30/06 (17)
- Tom tries to justify comparing the sound of speakers he has never heard! - Pat D 00:50:02 12/01/06 (16)
- Pat tries to justify his disapproval of my opinion of the SF Cremona Auditor ! - thetubeguy1954 06:31:28 12/01/06 (15)
- Would you review a theatre performance you never attended? - Pat D 08:22:36 12/01/06 (14)
- Let It Go Pat, Let It Go - thetubeguy1954 13:16:36 12/01/06 (13)
- Hey, it's OK as long as Tom is "comfortable!" - Pat D 17:55:13 12/01/06 (12)
- You're Finally Getting It Pat - thetubeguy1954 18:16:54 12/03/06 (11)
- Irony is lost on you, I think. (nt) - Pat D 19:36:34 12/03/06 (10)
- It's Not Lost, I Just Don't Accept Your Version Of It - thetubeguy1954 12:53:42 12/04/06 (9)
- My concern is that you don't discuss logically. - Pat D 14:45:12 12/04/06 (8)
- Re: My concern is that you don't discuss logically. - thetubeguy1954 08:44:30 12/05/06 (7)
- Re: My concern is that you don't discuss logically. - Pat D 09:04:20 12/05/06 (6)
- Pat, Pat, Pat... - thetubeguy1954 06:35:18 12/06/06 (5)
- Cheap debating tricks? - Pat D 07:56:43 12/06/06 (4)
- Cheap debating tricks, are being used by you Pat! I Give Up... - thetubeguy1954 14:19:09 12/06/06 (3)
- Put up or shut up!. - Pat D 15:53:56 12/06/06 (2)
- Just Learn To Read Pat - thetubeguy1954 07:14:00 12/07/06 (1)
- No, in context, your remarks are to invalidly argue against my audio philosophy by bashing my system and choices! - Pat D 08:05:21 12/08/06 (0)