The Nyquist criterion was developed for telephony. 'Nuff said. nt - clarkjohnsen

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - thetubeguy1954 09:17:55 11/07/06 (95)

The 47 Labs DAC and transport don't measure particularly badly. - Pat D 12:52:08 11/14/06 (43)

Re: The 47 Labs DAC and transport don't measure particularly badly. - thetubeguy1954 11:27:54 11/15/06 (42)

Re: The 47 Labs DAC and transport don't measure particularly badly. - Pat D 20:12:08 11/15/06 (41)

Re: The 47 Labs DAC and transport don't measure particularly badly. - thetubeguy1954 09:04:14 11/16/06 (40)

Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - Pat D 14:36:53 11/16/06 (39)

Re: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - thetubeguy1954 06:55:42 11/17/06 (33)

Re: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - Pat D 12:28:56 11/17/06 (32)

Re: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - thetubeguy1954 13:41:43 11/17/06 (31)

Re: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - Pat D 15:32:36 11/17/06 (30)

Re: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - thetubeguy1954 09:19:20 11/20/06 (29)

Re: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - Pat D 09:32:10 11/21/06 (28)

OK Pat, But I Did Compare the Aliantes vs The Paradigm. - thetubeguy1954 11:36:55 11/21/06 (27)

Re: OK Pat, But I Did Compare the Aliantes vs The Paradigm. - Pat D 14:48:57 11/21/06 (26)

Re: OK Pat, But I Did Compare the Aliantes vs The Paradigm. - thetubeguy1954 08:16:42 11/22/06 (25)

You keep on making up opinions and motives for me. I thought you were giving that up . . . - Pat D 21:29:04 11/22/06 (24)

That's YOUR Interpretation, It's Not What I Said or Meant. - thetubeguy1954 13:20:10 11/27/06 (23)

Nope! At this point I can read you like a book. (nt) - Pat D 15:38:17 11/27/06 (22)

Pat You Believe You Can Read Me Just Like The Book Called War & Peace, After You've Read The Comic Book Version. - thetubeguy1954 09:39:21 11/29/06 (21)

You haven't even heard the Sonus Faber Cremon Auditor - Pat D 10:56:13 11/29/06 (20)

Nor Have I Ever Claimed To! - thetubeguy1954 13:20:07 11/29/06 (19)

No, but you compare the SF Cremona Auditor to other speakers! - Pat D 15:00:49 11/29/06 (18)

And I've Told You How & Why I did That Many Times Now... - thetubeguy1954 09:48:37 11/30/06 (17)

Tom tries to justify comparing the sound of speakers he has never heard! - Pat D 00:50:02 12/01/06 (16)

Pat tries to justify his disapproval of my opinion of the SF Cremona Auditor ! - thetubeguy1954 06:31:28 12/01/06 (15)

Would you review a theatre performance you never attended? - Pat D 08:22:36 12/01/06 (14)

Let It Go Pat, Let It Go - thetubeguy1954 13:16:36 12/01/06 (13)

Hey, it's OK as long as Tom is "comfortable!" - Pat D 17:55:13 12/01/06 (12)

You're Finally Getting It Pat - thetubeguy1954 18:16:54 12/03/06 (11)

Irony is lost on you, I think. (nt) - Pat D 19:36:34 12/03/06 (10)

It's Not Lost, I Just Don't Accept Your Version Of It - thetubeguy1954 12:53:42 12/04/06 (9)

My concern is that you don't discuss logically. - Pat D 14:45:12 12/04/06 (8)

Re: My concern is that you don't discuss logically. - thetubeguy1954 08:44:30 12/05/06 (7)

Re: My concern is that you don't discuss logically. - Pat D 09:04:20 12/05/06 (6)

Pat, Pat, Pat... - thetubeguy1954 06:35:18 12/06/06 (5)

Cheap debating tricks? - Pat D 07:56:43 12/06/06 (4)

Cheap debating tricks, are being used by you Pat! I Give Up... - thetubeguy1954 14:19:09 12/06/06 (3)

Put up or shut up!. - Pat D 15:53:56 12/06/06 (2)

Just Learn To Read Pat - thetubeguy1954 07:14:00 12/07/06 (1)

No, in context, your remarks are to invalidly argue against my audio philosophy by bashing my system and choices! - Pat D 08:05:21 12/08/06 (0)

Re: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - morricab 00:50:30 11/17/06 (4)

Re: Yes, I have heard 47 Labs and you haven't. - Pat D 07:13:18 11/17/06 (3)

Restricted LF??? - kerr 16:59:09 11/17/06 (2)

I beg your pardon. - Pat D 17:33:51 11/17/06 (1)

No need - my mistake - kerr 06:08:50 11/18/06 (0)

I don't get it Tom? - Don T 13:45:35 11/11/06 (10)

I'll Attempt To Explain - thetubeguy1954 11:09:38 11/13/06 (9)

Look..... - Don T 19:07:23 11/13/06 (8)

This is stated perfectly - kerr 09:34:07 11/14/06 (1)

I Still Disagree... - thetubeguy1954 13:33:14 11/14/06 (0)

OK, But... - thetubeguy1954 08:55:07 11/14/06 (5)

Re: OK, But... - Don T 14:48:13 11/14/06 (4)

I'll Try Once Again - thetubeguy1954 07:39:20 11/15/06 (3)

Re: I'll Try Once Again - Don T 17:59:46 11/15/06 (2)

Bye-Bye Don - thetubeguy1954 10:44:14 11/16/06 (1)

Tom, Tom, Tom....... - Don T 07:56:23 11/17/06 (0)

Re: "These are MY beliefs". Good for you. nt - jensw 00:39:36 11/08/06 (0)

Re: we don't have the same hearing priorities - mls-stl 15:03:51 11/07/06 (9)

The "goal" is not to suit your sonic taste, .. - cheap-Jack 08:43:23 11/08/06 (7)

Re: replicating live is still a set of compromises - mls-stl 13:03:58 11/08/06 (5)

Re: replicating live is still a set of compromises - thetubeguy1954 13:45:59 11/08/06 (0)

I said "closest" to live music, not "replicating" it. - cheap-Jack 13:41:05 11/08/06 (3)

Re: still missing the point - mls-stl 14:46:49 11/08/06 (1)

Who really misses the point? - cheap-Jack 08:05:30 11/09/06 (0)

Amen To That! (NT) - thetubeguy1954 14:20:22 11/08/06 (0)

Re: The "goal" is not to suit your sonic taste, .. - thetubeguy1954 10:38:57 11/08/06 (0)

Great Response! - thetubeguy1954 06:47:42 11/08/06 (0)

There have been papers/ studies that address details about how humans interpret sounds.... - Ugly 13:56:50 11/07/06 (0)

Believe it or not, SET can work wonders. (long) - cheap-Jack 12:22:28 11/07/06 (0)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - tomservo 10:49:27 11/07/06 (20)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - andy19191 13:47:52 11/07/06 (4)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - tomservo 07:28:32 11/08/06 (3)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - andy19191 14:30:44 11/08/06 (1)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - tomservo 14:23:00 11/09/06 (0)

The Nyquist criterion was developed for telephony. 'Nuff said. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:30:48 11/08/06 (0)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - thetubeguy1954 13:32:47 11/07/06 (12)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - tomservo 08:04:44 11/08/06 (11)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - thetubeguy1954 10:08:01 11/08/06 (10)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - tomservo 12:32:51 11/08/06 (9)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - thetubeguy1954 09:20:27 11/09/06 (2)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - tomservo 19:36:55 11/09/06 (1)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - thetubeguy1954 10:25:48 11/10/06 (0)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - andy19191 14:54:35 11/08/06 (5)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - tomservo 16:05:39 11/08/06 (4)

Indeed - E-Stat 17:31:47 11/08/06 (3)

Re: Indeed - kerr 06:29:09 11/09/06 (2)

They were the only guys who cared about THD (nt) - E-Stat 09:21:14 11/09/06 (1)

How much could they hear - 0.000005%? LMAO! (nt) - kerr 09:37:36 11/09/06 (0)

Re: Another Sample Of An Audio Component That Doesn't Measure Well, But Sounds Great. - kerr 12:16:06 11/07/06 (1)

While I cannot confirm the accuracy of this statement - E-Stat 13:36:20 11/07/06 (0)

You're fast! - kerr 09:47:48 11/07/06 (4)

Re: You're fast! - thetubeguy1954 14:09:36 11/07/06 (3)

Re: You're fast! - kerr 09:20:32 11/08/06 (2)

Re: You're fast! - thetubeguy1954 12:12:53 11/08/06 (1)

Re: You're fast! - AJinFLA 13:55:23 12/10/06 (0)

pretty confused argument IMO - tunenut 09:36:19 11/07/06 (0)

Follow Ups

The Nyquist criterion was developed for telephony. 'Nuff said. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:30:48 11/08/06 (0)