Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

[ General ] [ Amp/Pre ] [ Speakers ] [ Hi-Eff ] [ Tubes ] [ SET ] [ OTL ] [ Tube/DIY ] [ Vinyl ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ]
[ Critics ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ DVD-A ] [ PC Audio ] [ Prop Head ] [ T ² ] [ Tape ] [ Tuners ] [ Vintage ] [ Music ] [ Hip Pop ] [ Rock ] [ Video ] [ Films ] [ Pro ] [ Chat ] [ Reviews ] [ Inmate Systems ] [ Central ] [ Water Cooler ] [ Shady ] [ Gallery ] [ Search ]

Specialty Groups: Tube DIY Asylum

Tech Square

Welcome! You must be a registered Inmate to post in this Asylum.

Previous Page View: Threads eThreads Sort: Date Update Unanswered Last: Visit 24 Hours 48 Hours

Free Classifieds

Cardas Hexlink Golden 5C Speaker Cable (... - vacumtubes

The cheapest CD tweek ever or how storage environment modifies the sound of your CDs - KlausR. 00:30:18 03/12/06 (143)
- Has no one noticed the obvious? - R Browne 19:16:41 03/25/06 (1)
  - It had been noticed already! - KlausR. 07:24:43 03/26/06 (0)
- EXTRA EXTRA! MONSTERS EXIST! - Presto 12:52:00 03/20/06 (4)
  - Something can be beyond reasoning & proof. (very off topic) - cheap-Jack 13:11:25 03/20/06 (3)
    - I'm no spirit expert but... - Presto 16:23:44 03/20/06 (2)
      - Re: I'm no spirit expert but... - soundmotor 05:14:54 03/30/06 (0)
      - Let 's look at the brighter side of belief: religions. - cheap-Jack 17:55:58 03/20/06 (0)
- try this: - real_jj 15:21:29 03/17/06 (32)
  - I had been thinking of doing just that... - KlausR. 04:20:02 03/18/06 (31)
    - A CONTROL!! Klaus I am really impressed. - Presto 13:07:42 03/19/06 (30)
      - Re: A CONTROL!! Klaus I am really impressed. - KlausR. 05:12:47 03/21/06 (3)
        
        What "skills" ?? - cheap-Jack 10:51:20 03/21/06 (1)
        
        Correction: - cheap-Jack 12:26:50 03/21/06 (0)
        
        Re: A CONTROL!! Klaus I am really impressed. - soulfood 09:44:45 03/21/06 (0)
      - What "immoral" ? (long) - cheap-Jack 12:15:19 03/20/06 (0)
      - Then we might have a non-story, unless the point was creating a lynch mob. (nt). - soulfood 09:37:12 03/20/06 (0)
      - I bet he'll hear some "difference". (long) - cheap-Jack 09:25:44 03/20/06 (23)
        
        I think you and others are focusing on the wrong thing. - Presto 11:48:58 03/20/06 (22)
        
        Great post! - kerr 09:03:37 03/21/06 (2)
        
        Is this the one you mean? - Presto 19:49:00 03/21/06 (1)
        
        Yep, that's it - kerr 04:53:58 03/22/06 (0)
        
        Sorry, you still miss the main point. - cheap-Jack 12:53:46 03/20/06 (18)
        
        There are *way* too many variables, the experiment is useless. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:10:35 03/21/06 (14)
        
        Exactly ! - cheap-Jack 12:14:21 03/21/06 (13)
        
        Yes, and moreover, were one to submit this regimen as establishing proof of the IC, do you know what would happen? nt - clarkjohnsen 07:48:19 03/22/06 (10)
        
        Sorry, what is "IC" ? - cheap-Jack 08:18:31 03/22/06 (9)
        
        That would be Intelligent Chip. And... - clarkjohnsen 08:22:47 03/22/06 (8)
        
        You got my message. Thanks. (nt) - cheap-Jack 08:26:18 03/22/06 (7)
        
        So, what do you think would happen? (See up the thread.) nt - clarkjohnsen 11:48:34 03/22/06 (6)
        
        Which thread? (nt) - cheap-Jack 13:30:43 03/22/06 (5)
        
        *This* thread, silly! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:01:40 03/23/06 (4)
        
        I'm silly. So pls repost "this thread" so I can comment. (nt) - cheap-Jack 12:30:03 03/23/06 (3)
        
        http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/prophead/messages/16220.html nt - clarkjohnsen 13:00:43 03/23/06 (2)
        
        Sorry. I can't retreive it ! (nt) - cheap-Jack 13:45:13 03/23/06 (1)
        
        Cut & paste. nt - clarkjohnsen 14:51:22 03/23/06 (0)
        
        Re: Exactly ! - soulfood 15:33:22 03/21/06 (0)
        
        Correction:- - cheap-Jack 12:28:28 03/21/06 (0)
        
        The main point is: - Presto 15:52:08 03/20/06 (2)
        
        Beat it, please! - cheap-Jack 18:10:44 03/20/06 (1)
        
        Beat it? I am sure you could do better than THAT! - Presto 18:58:07 03/20/06 (0)
- What a total blind test ! (long) - cheap-Jack 09:02:18 03/13/06 (50)
  - How about this... - Presto 11:41:14 03/14/06 (47)
    - What about it? - cheap-Jack 12:39:44 03/14/06 (46)
      - Yes my post was in the wrong spot but... - Presto 13:27:58 03/14/06 (45)
        
        Please qualify your "scientific method".. - cheap-Jack 13:37:49 03/14/06 (44)
        
        Re: Please qualify your "scientific method".. - Presto 14:17:37 03/14/06 (43)
        
        Good argument ! (long) - cheap-Jack 09:20:15 03/15/06 (42)
        
        Re: Good rebuttle. lol - Presto 17:28:22 03/15/06 (38)
        
        Try to read between the lines, my friend. - cheap-Jack 07:50:19 03/16/06 (37)
        
        What I would do is simple. - Presto 14:10:09 03/16/06 (36)
        
        Trust them or not, we hear with our ears. - cheap-Jack 09:09:33 03/17/06 (33)
        
        When they learn how to shine some ray through wine and tell us exactly how it tastes... - clarkjohnsen 09:17:14 03/17/06 (32)
        
        Re: When they learn how to shine some ray through wine and tell us exactly how it tastes... - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 10:45:19 03/17/06 (31)
        
        "We can tell flawed from [good or great]." There you have it, folks. - clarkjohnsen 08:27:53 03/18/06 (30)
        
        Re: "We can tell flawed from [good or great]." There you have it, folks. - kerr 04:49:18 03/20/06 (1)
        
        Yes. Thank you! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:27:30 03/20/06 (0)
        
        Re: a correction - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 00:28:40 03/19/06 (15)
        
        I too have hung out with wine, beer and coffee people. Never once... - clarkjohnsen 11:32:19 03/19/06 (14)
        
        Re: I too have hung out with wine, beer and coffee people. Never once... - john curl 16:40:18 03/19/06 (7)
        
        Re: I too have hung out with wine, beer and coffee people. Never once... - Inmate51 08:01:24 04/12/06 (0)
        
        What's your evidence, John? - real_jj 17:28:30 03/24/06 (0)
        
        Take a look below and discover how MKJ has weaseled out of his former, undefendable position. Very amusing. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:59:12 03/21/06 (3)
        
        Now that's just enough! - real_jj 17:31:34 03/24/06 (2)
        
        He narrowed his claims down to "research" from the broad ones he made earlier. Because he had to! - clarkjohnsen 09:06:36 03/25/06 (1)
        
        No, Clark, and that is really, really enough - real_jj 10:34:50 03/25/06 (0)
        
        Re: I too have hung out with wine, beer and coffee people. Never once... - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 01:10:11 03/20/06 (0)
        
        Re: I too have hung out with wine, beer and coffee people. Never once... - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 13:30:32 03/19/06 (5)
        
        This has nothing to do with Larry being an amateur. Nor were my claims false. - clarkjohnsen 09:34:41 03/20/06 (4)
        
        Re: One point of clarification - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 18:57:32 03/20/06 (0)
        
        Re: Your claims are false - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 18:17:04 03/20/06 (2)
        
        Oh, so now it's "wine research". You've narrowed the field of contention dramatically... - clarkjohnsen 07:56:51 03/21/06 (1)
        
        bullcrap - real_jj 17:34:10 03/24/06 (0)
        
        Martians regularly visit my apartment... - andy_c 20:24:43 03/18/06 (1)
        
        Re: Martians regularly visit my apartment... - kerr 04:55:02 03/20/06 (0)
        
        Well, Clark I agree to a point. - Presto 12:32:27 03/18/06 (9)
        
        Re: Well, Clark I agree to a point. - theaudiohobby 16:20:17 03/18/06 (8)
        
        Chris Sommovigo said it elegantly, for us who listen. - clarkjohnsen 10:37:24 03/19/06 (7)
        
        Irrelevant.... - real_jj 14:01:57 03/31/06 (3)
        
        "I would prefer it if you would be more logical in the future." And *I* would prefer it if... - clarkjohnsen 10:15:20 04/01/06 (2)
        
        Just accept the truth, Clark - real_jj 20:25:41 04/05/06 (1)
        
        Still making a spectator sport of yourself we see. - clarkjohnsen 08:00:02 04/06/06 (0)
        
        Re: He's full of it - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 11:30:42 03/19/06 (2)
        
        Notice you didn't mention Paul Prudhomme, nor did you take Chris's point. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:35:15 03/19/06 (1)
        
        Re: Notice you didn't mention Paul Prudhomme, nor did you take Chris's point. nt - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 13:32:21 03/19/06 (0)
        
        Re: A better method - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 00:16:19 03/17/06 (1)
        
        HEAR HEAR! EXACTLY!!! lol Nicely Put. (nt) - Presto 12:33:29 03/18/06 (0)
        
        Re: Good argument ! (long) - theaudiohobby 11:22:09 03/15/06 (2)
        
        Why change subject ? Nitpicking or what? - cheap-Jack 11:57:44 03/15/06 (1)
        
        Re: Why change subject ? Nitpicking or what? - theaudiohobby 16:45:11 03/16/06 (0)
  - Re: What a total blind test ! (long) - KlausR. 10:04:57 03/13/06 (1)
    - Well, I can't reason out why? - cheap-Jack 10:43:13 03/13/06 (0)
- Re: Still can't get that chip out of your head, eh? LoL nt - geoffkait 15:56:57 03/12/06 (7)
  - Re: LoL - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 22:40:27 03/12/06 (6)
    - Re: Yeah, right... - geoffkait 03:35:34 03/13/06 (5)
      - Re: LoL - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 08:54:55 03/13/06 (4)
        
        Re: I'm sure that's... - geoffkait 09:29:15 03/13/06 (3)
        
        Re: wishful thinking - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 14:19:36 03/13/06 (2)
        
        Re: otherwise intelligent people - geoffkait 15:18:20 03/13/06 (1)
        
        He's a worried man. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:18:54 03/16/06 (0)
- Fantastic audiophile hearing boasts are quite common - Caymus 10:20:30 03/12/06 (23)
  - Hey, Caymus... - real_jj 15:22:37 03/17/06 (6)
    - Yikes - E-Stat, clarkjohnsen, mkuller and Wellfed are working themselves into a witch-hunt frenzy! - Caymus 19:51:35 03/18/06 (0)
    - Maybe this time he'll respond. Good luck (nt) - E-Stat 16:58:07 03/17/06 (4)
      - Your ignorance and technical incompetence is making a fool of you - Caymus 17:13:31 03/18/06 (2)
        
        First learn about IP addresses are? - E-Stat 19:17:55 03/18/06 (1)
        
        You need a better primer, then - real_jj 12:39:36 03/19/06 (0)
      - I admit to curiousity - real_jj 20:59:43 03/17/06 (0)
  - Exactly. - Presto 11:59:11 03/14/06 (6)
    - Re: Exactly. - kerr 09:35:55 03/15/06 (0)
    - Before you go on accusing people,.. - cheap-Jack 13:22:33 03/14/06 (4)
      - Well... - kerr 09:29:14 03/15/06 (2)
        
        I never said Fine Arts now did I? (nt) - Presto 12:32:29 03/20/06 (1)
        
        No. And your point is...? - kerr 05:16:34 03/21/06 (0)
      - My credentials? - Presto 13:50:37 03/14/06 (0)
  - "Proof" what ?????? - cheap-Jack 08:51:53 03/14/06 (7)
    - Um, excuse me, but you need to read up a bit - real_jj 15:30:04 03/17/06 (0)
    - Yikes, my reply got deleted by the moderator! - Caymus 10:46:59 03/14/06 (5)
      - Not allowed to... - Wellfed 11:44:55 03/14/06 (4)
        
        "Hearing is an ‘observation’ – not proof" - Caymus 19:06:17 03/14/06 (3)
        
        Don't play dumb with me... - Wellfed 20:43:36 03/14/06 (2)
        
        My comments on Kait's business practices and products were the thread above - Caymus 21:39:49 03/14/06 (1)
        
        Let me guess... - Wellfed 22:21:03 03/14/06 (0)
  - What "proof" you want to prove your own hearing? (nt) - cheap-Jack 11:56:36 03/13/06 (0)
- "What else [does the audiophile community] want us to believe?" LOL! - clarkjohnsen 10:20:07 03/12/06 (16)
  - Did you try it? - KlausR. 09:48:11 03/13/06 (15)
    - Try what? This post makes about as much sense as you ever do. "Hesitate"? Huh? nt - clarkjohnsen 10:03:44 03/13/06 (14)
      - Re: Try what? - KlausR. 10:09:52 03/13/06 (13)
        
        That has nothing to do with what I said, and besides it's a pointless task. nt - clarkjohnsen 10:36:24 03/13/06 (12)
        
        I knew it was only a matter of time... - Presto 12:03:25 03/14/06 (0)
        
        Why pointless? - KlausR. 00:32:17 03/14/06 (10)
        
        Didn't "dismiss" the tweak (which, by the way, it isn't)... - clarkjohnsen 12:45:25 03/14/06 (3)
        
        Not a tweak??? - KlausR. 04:29:18 03/18/06 (2)
        
        These worthies have not been identified, so I do not know whether I have had any experience with them. - clarkjohnsen 08:12:28 03/18/06 (1)
        
        Bona fide - KlausR. 09:07:41 03/18/06 (0)
        
        Klaus. here is why. - Presto 12:24:45 03/14/06 (5)
        
        Re: Klaus. here is why. - KlausR. 04:46:43 03/18/06 (3)
        
        Re: Physical changes - geoffkait 05:22:30 03/18/06 (2)
        
        Re: Physical changes - KlausR. 07:51:11 03/18/06 (1)
        
        Re: Physical changes - geoffkait 10:59:24 03/18/06 (0)
        
        Re: Klaus. here is why. - Pat D 08:43:39 03/17/06 (0)
- Re: The cheapest CD tweek ever or how storage environment modifies the sound of your CDs - soulfood 08:08:47 03/12/06 (0)
- Re: The cheapest CD tweek ever or how storage environment modifies the sound of your CDs - porziob@aol.com 07:54:12 03/12/06 (0)
- Re: The cheapest CD tweek ever or how storage environment modifies the sound of your CDs - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 02:50:43 03/12/06 (0)
Design challenge - porziob@aol.com 11:17:28 03/08/06 (12)
- From a layman's perspective - E-Stat 17:39:24 03/08/06 (4)
  - Confused - Tre' 18:42:28 03/10/06 (2)
    - I was primarily referring to SS designs - E-Stat 06:18:20 03/11/06 (1)
      - I've got tubes on the brain. It's not a fatal disease, but it is a disease. nt - Tre' 08:00:34 03/11/06 (0)
  - My layman's view is the sonic results. - cheap-Jack 08:29:24 03/09/06 (0)
- Nothing comes easy. - cheap-Jack 11:32:29 03/08/06 (6)
  - Re: Nothing comes easy. - porziob@aol.com 11:45:53 03/08/06 (5)
    - The same principle applies. - cheap-Jack 12:21:49 03/08/06 (4)
      - Re: The same principle applies. - john curl 16:35:15 03/10/06 (1)
        
        Very true. - cheap-Jack 07:38:58 03/13/06 (0)
      - Re: The same principle applies. - porziob@aol.com 13:37:40 03/08/06 (1)
        
        So, which do you think more difficult to design ? (nt) - cheap-Jack 06:44:09 03/09/06 (0)
SEJ, I see you deleted your reponse to one of my posts - E-Stat 14:42:03 03/06/06 (44)
- Re: SEJ, I see you deleted your reponse to one of my posts - Silver Eared John 17:22:18 03/06/06 (43)
  - That's right - I suspect you still have no idea what the "E-Mail Replies" checkbox does! - E-Stat 18:13:31 03/06/06 (42)
    - Show it! Show it! (I have a neat little collection myself.) nt - clarkjohnsen 14:52:19 03/07/06 (41)
      - Let's wait to see if figures out what I'm talking about...but - E-Stat 17:30:42 03/07/06 (40)
        
        OK Inspector Clouseau - you caught me! - Caymus 19:19:22 03/18/06 (0)
        
        Hey! I'm unique too! (Like everyone...) So "Caymus" is jj? That explains the overt hostility to us mere listeners. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:13:24 03/08/06 (34)
        
        I never said he was fake - E-Stat 16:43:30 03/08/06 (9)
        
        Really, now? You sure? - real_jj 11:44:27 03/09/06 (8)
        
        This gets more amusing with each chapter! - E-Stat 15:58:28 03/09/06 (7)
        
        Right, now, you insinuated what? - real_jj 00:07:43 03/10/06 (6)
        
        Still having trouble with the dictionary - E-Stat 05:31:18 03/10/06 (5)
        
        No, just with your insinuations and your behavior - real_jj 09:36:01 03/10/06 (4)
        
        You take yourself far too seriously :) - E-Stat 17:38:27 03/10/06 (3)
        
        You done yet? - real_jj 21:50:28 03/10/06 (2)
        
        How many States are you wanted in anyway?... - Wellfed 00:28:45 03/13/06 (1)
        
        The state of confusion, at least. - real_jj 19:33:15 03/15/06 (0)
        
        Not he's the fake jj - that explains your overt hostility to us mere listeners..(nt) - mkuller 10:04:53 03/08/06 (23)
        
        Who's fake, stalker? - real_jj 13:11:49 03/08/06 (22)
        
        So where's the evidence of who you really are? - mkuller 13:43:02 03/08/06 (21)
        
        You can get it, stalker... you can get it. - real_jj 16:00:14 03/08/06 (20)
        
        Here's evidence... - mkuller 10:59:03 03/09/06 (14)
        
        No, you can get evidence yourself. It's your claim, not mine. - real_jj 11:24:23 03/09/06 (13)
        
        Sending email to that website *proves* nada... - mkuller 12:05:06 03/09/06 (12)
        
        That's enough, Mr. Kuller - real_jj 13:42:19 03/09/06 (4)
        
        Actually, your new... - mkuller 15:19:55 03/09/06 (3)
        
        Do your dilligence, sir... - real_jj 15:34:13 03/09/06 (2)
        
        If it makes you happy... - mkuller 16:29:38 03/09/06 (1)
        
        No, that's not good enough. - real_jj 18:47:51 03/09/06 (0)
        
        And while we're at it... - mkuller 12:07:40 03/09/06 (6)
        
        Send the email, crackpot - real_jj 13:43:31 03/09/06 (5)
        
        You mean, send the email to the crackpot...sheesh(nt) - mkuller 15:21:36 03/09/06 (4)
        
        Do your dilligence, sir - real_jj 15:35:26 03/09/06 (3)
        
        Still no dilligence... - real_jj 01:03:11 03/12/06 (2)
        
        Are you stalking me, now? (nt) - mkuller 11:53:48 03/12/06 (1)
        
        Still no dilligence? You made your claim, now investigate it. - real_jj 21:01:40 03/12/06 (0)
        
        Nope, just checked, you haven't tried - real_jj 16:04:04 03/08/06 (4)
        
        Still nothing... - real_jj 22:16:26 03/08/06 (3)
        
        Hey! You asked how you could verify this.... SO DO IT - real_jj 10:42:33 03/09/06 (2)
        
        Re: Hey! You asked how you could verify this.... SO DO IT - Pat D 13:42:03 03/09/06 (1)
        
        You're confusing your subjects, Pat - E-Stat 16:18:22 03/09/06 (0)
        
        "it"? - Silver Eared John 19:08:20 03/07/06 (3)
        
        That would be your deleted message - E-Stat 19:26:49 03/07/06 (2)
        
        Well, y'all seem to have an antecedant problem - Silver Eared John 12:57:45 03/08/06 (1)
        
        No, Clark doesn't have an antecedent problem - E-Stat 16:31:17 03/08/06 (0)
Class D Amps - Dan Banquer 05:14:32 03/04/06 (12)
- Re: Class D Amps - Todd Krieger 00:37:28 03/06/06 (10)
  - Re: Class D Amps - aljordan 07:05:20 03/09/06 (2)
    - Re: Class D Amps - Todd Krieger 21:15:11 03/09/06 (1)
      - Re: Class D Amps - aljordan 12:35:26 03/10/06 (0)
  - Re: Class D Amps - Tom Dawson 22:20:40 03/08/06 (1)
    - Are you sure? (long) - cheap-Jack 09:11:23 03/10/06 (0)
  - You're not alone.. - cheap-Jack 08:57:49 03/07/06 (2)
    - Re: You're not alone.. - Todd Krieger 03:20:38 03/08/06 (1)
      - I share yr view but..... (long) - cheap-Jack 09:25:59 03/08/06 (0)
  - Re: Class D Amps - theaudiohobby 04:31:53 03/06/06 (0)
  - Did y'all ever read "Waldo"? - Silver Eared John 00:45:43 03/06/06 (0)
- I like his company's approach - E-Stat 06:21:52 03/04/06 (0)
Previous Page

Threads started on or before 2/28/06 are archived Here.
Threads started on or before 1/31/06 are archived Here.
Threads started on or before 1/15/06 are archived Here.
Threads started on or before 12/31/05 are archived Here.
Threads started on or before 12/15/05 are archived Here.

[

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

Propeller Head Plaza

You can not post to an archived thread.