That would be your deleted message - E-Stat

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - SEJ, I see you deleted your reponse to one of my posts - E-Stat 14:42:03 03/06/06 (44)

Re: SEJ, I see you deleted your reponse to one of my posts - Silver Eared John 17:22:18 03/06/06 (43)

That's right - I suspect you still have no idea what the "E-Mail Replies" checkbox does! - E-Stat 18:13:31 03/06/06 (42)

Show it! Show it! (I have a neat little collection myself.) nt - clarkjohnsen 14:52:19 03/07/06 (41)

Let's wait to see if figures out what I'm talking about...but - E-Stat 17:30:42 03/07/06 (40)

OK Inspector Clouseau - you caught me! - Caymus 19:19:22 03/18/06 (0)

Hey! I'm unique too! (Like everyone...) So "Caymus" is jj? That explains the overt hostility to us mere listeners. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:13:24 03/08/06 (34)

I never said he was fake - E-Stat 16:43:30 03/08/06 (9)

Really, now? You sure? - real_jj 11:44:27 03/09/06 (8)

This gets more amusing with each chapter! - E-Stat 15:58:28 03/09/06 (7)

Right, now, you insinuated what? - real_jj 00:07:43 03/10/06 (6)

Still having trouble with the dictionary - E-Stat 05:31:18 03/10/06 (5)

No, just with your insinuations and your behavior - real_jj 09:36:01 03/10/06 (4)

You take yourself far too seriously :) - E-Stat 17:38:27 03/10/06 (3)

You done yet? - real_jj 21:50:28 03/10/06 (2)

How many States are you wanted in anyway?... - Wellfed 00:28:45 03/13/06 (1)

The state of confusion, at least. - real_jj 19:33:15 03/15/06 (0)

Not he's the fake jj - that explains your overt hostility to us mere listeners..(nt) - mkuller 10:04:53 03/08/06 (23)

Who's fake, stalker? - real_jj 13:11:49 03/08/06 (22)

So where's the evidence of who you really are? - mkuller 13:43:02 03/08/06 (21)

You can get it, stalker... you can get it. - real_jj 16:00:14 03/08/06 (20)

Here's evidence... - mkuller 10:59:03 03/09/06 (14)

No, you can get evidence yourself. It's your claim, not mine. - real_jj 11:24:23 03/09/06 (13)

Sending email to that website *proves* nada... - mkuller 12:05:06 03/09/06 (12)

That's enough, Mr. Kuller - real_jj 13:42:19 03/09/06 (4)

Actually, your new... - mkuller 15:19:55 03/09/06 (3)

Do your dilligence, sir... - real_jj 15:34:13 03/09/06 (2)

If it makes you happy... - mkuller 16:29:38 03/09/06 (1)

No, that's not good enough. - real_jj 18:47:51 03/09/06 (1)

And while we're at it... - mkuller 12:07:40 03/09/06 (6)

Send the email, crackpot - real_jj 13:43:31 03/09/06 (5)

You mean, send the email to the crackpot...sheesh(nt) - mkuller 15:21:36 03/09/06 (4)

Do your dilligence, sir - real_jj 15:35:26 03/09/06 (3)

Still no dilligence... - real_jj 01:03:11 03/12/06 (2)

Are you stalking me, now? (nt) - mkuller 11:53:48 03/12/06 (1)

Still no dilligence? You made your claim, now investigate it. - real_jj 21:01:40 03/12/06 (0)

Nope, just checked, you haven't tried - real_jj 16:04:04 03/08/06 (4)

Still nothing... - real_jj 22:16:26 03/08/06 (3)

Hey! You asked how you could verify this.... SO DO IT - real_jj 10:42:33 03/09/06 (2)

Re: Hey! You asked how you could verify this.... SO DO IT - Pat D 13:42:03 03/09/06 (1)

You're confusing your subjects, Pat - E-Stat 16:18:22 03/09/06 (0)

"it"? - Silver Eared John 19:08:20 03/07/06 (3)

That would be your deleted message - E-Stat 19:26:49 03/07/06 (2)

Well, y'all seem to have an antecedant problem - Silver Eared John 12:57:45 03/08/06 (1)

No, Clark doesn't have an antecedent problem - E-Stat 16:31:17 03/08/06 (0)

Follow Ups

That would be your deleted message - E-Stat 19:26:49 03/07/06 (2)

Well, y'all seem to have an antecedant problem - Silver Eared John 12:57:45 03/08/06 (1)

No, Clark doesn't have an antecedent problem - E-Stat 16:31:17 03/08/06 (0)