Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

What about it?

Hi.

Are you talking to the wrong guy?

Where in my posts ever endorsed such subjective findings of the CDs
in questions. Do I want to bother?

Please read my post below on subjectivity before you open your mouth.

Who's problem is this? yours or mine?

Who is turning "belief to science"? It's YOU who believe such find is invalid. How are you so sure? Were you there in the same audition to disprove the findings? Obviously, not. So your argument is also invalid as you merely comment from your disbelief. And you fail to provide scientific proof that the findings were invalid.

This is the problem of so many who are misguided by so called pseudo-science. Science is a process or a tool to understand systematically the nature - human aural conception, in this case. Many fail to accept the fact science todate fails to prove or reject anything we hear due to our lack of relevant knowledge.

why don't we wait until one day we know more about the science of audio perception before we start to challenge subjectivity with science.

While one can't come up with adequate scientific understanding of our hearing to approve AND disapprove it, please leave those who make such sonic claims alone.

One still remains innocent until convicted after trial. This applies to sonics as well.

c-J




This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  The Cable Cooker  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.