Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

"Proof" what ??????

Hi.

Let's make it straight: Hearing is a human nature.

Science is defined as "systematic knowledge"; investigation of this.
(per Webster's New Dicttionary).

So, science is a process to investigate systematically what we hear,
& to prove OR disprove it.

The question is: how much science can do todate to be able to prove or disprove this human nature.

We all know not MUCH we can do to prove it with the scientific methodology available todate.

So your statement: "your gullible readers don't require PROOF" is moot.

So please answer my question: What is your "proof" that you
don't hear what they can hear is NOT your own hearing problem?

Likewise to reply to your e-mail to me, you must have been taught the "Scientific Method" in grade school. Why not explain to us
scientifically why you can't hear what they can hear?

My layman comment is: their ears are better than yours. Period.

Aural perception is personally subjective. It doesn't need to be proven to any other parties it is there or not.

The bottom line is: please don't challenge whoever's hearing ability
unless you can ever prove it is a gimmick. Otherwise, may I suggest you to leave them alone.

Why attack someone's aural ability instead of reviewing why I can't hear them? My poor hearing or my audio gear can not deliver?

I like fine dines in some restaurants. Do I need to be a gourmet to prove how good is the food there before I can recommend to my friends?????

It is only common sense logics.

c-J



This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.