In Reply to: Re: SEJ, I see you deleted your reponse to one of my posts posted by Silver Eared John on March 6, 2006 at 17:22:18:
The Asylum emails a complete text copy of replies to posts when that option is chosen.Forgotten already? I guess the good part of having such a short memory is that you meet so many new people. If you like, I'll be happy to jog your memory with the contents of post 16006 that you decided to delete. :)
rw
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- That's right - I suspect you still have no idea what the "E-Mail Replies" checkbox does! - E-Stat 18:13:31 03/06/06 (42)
- Show it! Show it! (I have a neat little collection myself.) nt - clarkjohnsen 14:52:19 03/07/06 (41)
- Let's wait to see if figures out what I'm talking about...but - E-Stat 17:30:42 03/07/06 (40)
- OK Inspector Clouseau - you caught me! - Caymus 19:19:22 03/18/06 (0)
- Hey! I'm unique too! (Like everyone...) So "Caymus" is jj? That explains the overt hostility to us mere listeners. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:13:24 03/08/06 (34)
- I never said he was fake - E-Stat 16:43:30 03/08/06 (9)
- Really, now? You sure? - real_jj 11:44:27 03/09/06 (8)
- This gets more amusing with each chapter! - E-Stat 15:58:28 03/09/06 (7)
- Right, now, you insinuated what? - real_jj 00:07:43 03/10/06 (6)
- Still having trouble with the dictionary - E-Stat 05:31:18 03/10/06 (5)
- No, just with your insinuations and your behavior - real_jj 09:36:01 03/10/06 (4)
- You take yourself far too seriously :) - E-Stat 17:38:27 03/10/06 (3)
- You done yet? - real_jj 21:50:28 03/10/06 (2)
- How many States are you wanted in anyway?... - Wellfed 00:28:45 03/13/06 (1)
- The state of confusion, at least. - real_jj 19:33:15 03/15/06 (0)
- Not he's the fake jj - that explains your overt hostility to us mere listeners..(nt) - mkuller 10:04:53 03/08/06 (23)
- Who's fake, stalker? - real_jj 13:11:49 03/08/06 (22)
- So where's the evidence of who you really are? - mkuller 13:43:02 03/08/06 (21)
- You can get it, stalker... you can get it. - real_jj 16:00:14 03/08/06 (20)
- Here's evidence... - mkuller 10:59:03 03/09/06 (14)
- No, you can get evidence yourself. It's your claim, not mine. - real_jj 11:24:23 03/09/06 (13)
- Sending email to that website *proves* nada... - mkuller 12:05:06 03/09/06 (12)
- That's enough, Mr. Kuller - real_jj 13:42:19 03/09/06 (4)
- Actually, your new... - mkuller 15:19:55 03/09/06 (3)
- Do your dilligence, sir... - real_jj 15:34:13 03/09/06 (2)
- If it makes you happy... - mkuller 16:29:38 03/09/06 (1)
- No, that's not good enough. - real_jj 18:47:51 03/09/06 (1)
- And while we're at it... - mkuller 12:07:40 03/09/06 (6)
- Send the email, crackpot - real_jj 13:43:31 03/09/06 (5)
- You mean, send the email to the crackpot...sheesh(nt) - mkuller 15:21:36 03/09/06 (4)
- Do your dilligence, sir - real_jj 15:35:26 03/09/06 (3)
- Still no dilligence... - real_jj 01:03:11 03/12/06 (2)
- Are you stalking me, now? (nt) - mkuller 11:53:48 03/12/06 (1)
- Still no dilligence? You made your claim, now investigate it. - real_jj 21:01:40 03/12/06 (0)
- Nope, just checked, you haven't tried - real_jj 16:04:04 03/08/06 (4)
- Still nothing... - real_jj 22:16:26 03/08/06 (3)
- Hey! You asked how you could verify this.... SO DO IT - real_jj 10:42:33 03/09/06 (2)
- Re: Hey! You asked how you could verify this.... SO DO IT - Pat D 13:42:03 03/09/06 (1)
- You're confusing your subjects, Pat - E-Stat 16:18:22 03/09/06 (0)
- "it"? - Silver Eared John 19:08:20 03/07/06 (3)
- That would be your deleted message - E-Stat 19:26:49 03/07/06 (2)
- Well, y'all seem to have an antecedant problem - Silver Eared John 12:57:45 03/08/06 (1)
- No, Clark doesn't have an antecedent problem - E-Stat 16:31:17 03/08/06 (0)