In Reply to: I think you and others are focusing on the wrong thing. posted by Presto on March 20, 2006 at 11:48:58:
HI.I already reiterate what the magazine guy commented: he could tell the sonic difference of the 3CDs, but he could NOT tell what floors on which the CDs were stored.
Isn't it the end of these going-on-&-on debate? But you still carry on to challenge his sonic findings. The storage flooring issue was already out of the picture as he failed the test. So, why you still want to go on with the storage location issue?
IMO, there is technical explanation on his different sonic findings on the 3 CDs as you already rightly suggested in your post below.
This could be the result of using blank CD (R or RW) of different brands & shipment patches (different patches of plastic compounds used & different CD moulding processes). Even if these CDs were taken from the same make & same batch (I hope), how could you be so sure the computer writer wrote the music IDENTICALLY on the 3 CDs??????
All these can result different sound given good ears & audio plauback gears of high resolution.
So why all these speculations on something so obvious?
c-J
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Sorry, you still miss the main point. - cheap-Jack 12:53:46 03/20/06 (18)
- There are *way* too many variables, the experiment is useless. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:10:35 03/21/06 (14)
- Exactly ! - cheap-Jack 12:14:21 03/21/06 (13)
- Yes, and moreover, were one to submit this regimen as establishing proof of the IC, do you know what would happen? nt - clarkjohnsen 07:48:19 03/22/06 (10)
- Sorry, what is "IC" ? - cheap-Jack 08:18:31 03/22/06 (9)
- That would be Intelligent Chip. And... - clarkjohnsen 08:22:47 03/22/06 (8)
- You got my message. Thanks. (nt) - cheap-Jack 08:26:18 03/22/06 (7)
- So, what do you think would happen? (See up the thread.) nt - clarkjohnsen 11:48:34 03/22/06 (6)
- Which thread? (nt) - cheap-Jack 13:30:43 03/22/06 (5)
- *This* thread, silly! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:01:40 03/23/06 (4)
- I'm silly. So pls repost "this thread" so I can comment. (nt) - cheap-Jack 12:30:03 03/23/06 (3)
- http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/prophead/messages/16220.html nt - clarkjohnsen 13:00:43 03/23/06 (2)
- Sorry. I can't retreive it ! (nt) - cheap-Jack 13:45:13 03/23/06 (1)
- Cut & paste. nt - clarkjohnsen 14:51:22 03/23/06 (0)
- Re: Exactly ! - soulfood 15:33:22 03/21/06 (0)
- Correction:- - cheap-Jack 12:28:28 03/21/06 (0)
- The main point is: - Presto 15:52:08 03/20/06 (2)
- Beat it, please! - cheap-Jack 18:10:44 03/20/06 (1)
- Beat it? I am sure you could do better than THAT! - Presto 18:58:07 03/20/06 (0)