In Reply to: So you admit... posted by mkuller on November 18, 2005 at 11:50:25:
...you'd be the loser, slick.
You know, there are a number of approaches y'all can take in a situation like this where you think you are correct and someone is mistaken. One would be to educate them (if you really know what y'all are talking about), provide some real information, a link or two, etc.
The other would be to act pompous and superior and start putiing the other person down and calling names.Which do you think might win you that contest y'all be mentioning, sport?
---If you knew the answers, you wouldn't say "think you are correct".
You are, there, clearly showing neutrality for a well-known, obvious set of facts regarding sampling.
I will conceded that you could, instead, be feigning neutrality in order to further some obscure, but unethical agenda. If so, then you are guilty of something worse than ignorance, you are guilty of deliberately supporting something you know is wrong. That is worse than ignorance, but if you agree that is the case, then I will withdraw my accusation of ignorance, and then accuse you of willfully spreading ignorance when you know better.
Take your choice. Your words, your choice, your own bed to lie in.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Quoting you from above in this thread - Silver Eared John 14:13:01 11/18/05 (6)
- Re: Quoting you from above in this thread - john curl 17:34:38 11/18/05 (5)
- Y'all like to call names, don't y'all? - Silver Eared John 01:22:24 11/19/05 (4)
- Re: Y'all like to call names, don't y'all? - john curl 09:22:52 11/19/05 (3)
- Yep, y'all just like to call names. - Silver Eared John 10:43:21 11/19/05 (2)
- Hypocrite - look in the mirror... LOL!... - mkuller 13:42:12 11/20/05 (1)
- I can. Can y'all, or do you wince when you look? - Silver Eared John 18:12:54 11/22/05 (0)