In Reply to: Re: Now y'all hold on. posted by Tom Dawson on November 15, 2005 at 14:03:27:
What do y'all think the interchannel resolution of a standard Red Book CD is, in time units?It's a whole lot smaller than 5 to 10 microseconds, which is the best confirmed test of interaural time difference I've heard of.
Of course, it's also way better than 2 microseconds, so your number doesn't matter.
What do y'all think interchannel resolution is limited to, anyhow?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Now, y'all hold on there. - Silver Eared John 14:06:24 11/15/05 (40)
- Re: Now, y'all hold on there. - Tom Dawson 22:21:05 11/15/05 (5)
- No, that's not the worst case, guy - Silver Eared John 12:53:17 11/16/05 (4)
- 'Fraid it is. Your argument fails due to its absolute dependence on extremely long spectral timing averaging requirement - Tom Dawson 07:16:49 11/23/05 (3)
- Y'all say? Well, y'all say, but no, it's not true - Silver Eared John 20:58:53 11/24/05 (2)
- What do you not understand about the potential interchannel sampling timing error of a transition of arbitrary size? - Tom Dawson 22:00:29 11/24/05 (1)
- There ain't none, that's what I understand. - Silver Eared John 11:12:57 11/25/05 (0)
- Re: Now, y'all hold on there. - macaque 14:36:54 11/15/05 (33)
- No, no, no - Silver Eared John 15:54:32 11/15/05 (32)
- Re: No, no, no - macaque 14:17:55 11/16/05 (31)
- Y'all missing something important there. - Silver Eared John 15:45:24 11/16/05 (30)
- Re: Y'all missing something important there. - macaque 17:23:49 11/16/05 (29)
- Why not just listen, then look… - jcox 20:16:20 11/18/05 (0)
- No, there isn't. - Silver Eared John 18:52:24 11/16/05 (27)
- Re: No, there isn't. - macaque 05:17:23 11/17/05 (26)
- Re: No, there isn't. - Todd Krieger 20:33:06 11/17/05 (23)
- Oh, more mythology - Silver Eared John 22:42:19 11/17/05 (22)
- Oh Really?? - Todd Krieger 01:50:32 11/18/05 (21)
- You're full of it. - Silver Eared John 13:59:04 11/18/05 (0)
- Re: Oh Really?? - macaque 06:58:07 11/18/05 (19)
- Noise? - Silver Eared John 14:00:09 11/18/05 (11)
- Re: Noise? - macaque 14:57:55 11/18/05 (10)
- Indeed. - Silver Eared John 16:14:12 11/18/05 (9)
- Re: Indeed. - macaque 17:40:26 11/18/05 (8)
- Re: Indeed. - Todd Krieger 23:21:00 11/18/05 (7)
- Re: Indeed. - Links to PDFs - macaque 07:14:25 11/19/05 (3)
- Outstanding! Thanks. (nt) - andy_c 13:13:59 11/20/05 (0)
- Links to PDFs - Thanks..... - Todd Krieger 21:41:32 11/19/05 (1)
- Re: Links to PDFs - Thanks..... - macaque 09:19:26 11/21/05 (0)
- Goodness, gracious, and you're talking like an expert? - Silver Eared John 01:20:10 11/19/05 (2)
- Re: Goodness, gracious, and you're talking like an expert? - macaque 07:48:24 11/19/05 (1)
- Well, there are some issues, I'm sure. - Silver Eared John 10:42:34 11/19/05 (0)
- Re: Oh Really?? - Todd Krieger 09:56:19 11/18/05 (6)
- Re: Oh Really?? - macaque 10:50:34 11/18/05 (5)
- Bit depth vs.analog stuff - Silver Eared John 11:50:06 11/22/05 (3)
- Re: Bit depth vs.analog stuff - john curl 10:38:20 11/24/05 (2)
- Bull pucky, plain and simple. - Silver Eared John 11:15:44 11/25/05 (1)
- Re: Bull pucky, plain and simple. - john curl 11:26:08 11/25/05 (0)
- I Think You Got It.... - Todd Krieger 22:55:44 11/18/05 (0)
- Re: No, there isn't. - Silver Eared John 16:16:55 11/17/05 (0)
- Testing capability of extyracting correlated info from noise - Jacques 07:04:16 11/17/05 (0)