In Reply to: Re: Do you REALLY want to know what the chip is? NO. posted by john curl on June 23, 2005 at 07:25:03:
"The Intelligent Chip works via coherent quantum superposition and quantum entanglement, in which two coherent light sources - the CD laser and the quantum dot laser in the chip - interact strongly with the atoms and molecules in the CD's polycarbonate layer to produce long-lasting, superior transparency and better optical signal to noise ratio (SNR). Laser light escapes the player via a number of small holes and gaps in the player case. The emitted light from the quantum dot laser instantly comingles with the CD laser light in the room and inside the player."No John, it does not. And it's entitled "The Definitive Explanation". Does not sound very hypothical to me.
And he bases his explanation on lots of false assumptions, a physicist like you should be aware of that.
And he bases his explanation on the presence of q-dots on the chip: how does he know, how do you know, did you have the chip examined?
So what's left to done? Follow Allan's advice, carry the chip to a decent lab and have it examined. Why would you refuse to do that, any particular reason that we might not be aware of?
Once you are sure that there's q-material present you can start hypothesizing, but please without violating rules and laws of physics.
Klaus
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Does this sound like hypothesizing? - KlausR. 07:52:40 06/23/05 (27)
- The question begs asking... - Wellfed 09:11:35 06/23/05 (26)
- Even if I did have the chip examined... - KlausR. 00:56:09 06/24/05 (9)
- I wouldn't care... - Wellfed 12:37:46 07/01/05 (8)
- Then you are the perfect target... - KlausR. 22:04:18 07/01/05 (7)
- You presumably miss my point... - Wellfed 22:21:18 07/01/05 (6)
- I make you a proposal - KlausR. 05:19:40 07/02/05 (1)
- Sounds good... - Wellfed 20:12:15 07/02/05 (0)
- I don't think I've missed your point! - KlausR. 04:11:49 07/02/05 (3)
- Don't forget... - Wellfed 20:49:56 07/02/05 (2)
- Re: Don't forget... - john curl 22:26:22 07/03/05 (1)
- Encouragement/reinforcement. - soulfood 08:52:17 07/04/05 (0)
- there's no need - BS64 11:43:41 06/23/05 (11)
- Is that so?... - Wellfed 14:17:55 06/23/05 (10)
- "Don't you have anything better to do?" - BS64 15:32:05 06/23/05 (9)
- What is the context of your "gloating"?... - Wellfed 16:21:04 06/23/05 (8)
- Re: What is the context of your "gloating"?... - BS64 08:49:12 06/26/05 (7)
- I didn't tell Klaus to have the GSIC tested... - Wellfed 19:32:32 06/28/05 (6)
- "...given your level of interest in the subject, why don't YOU have the chip tested? " - BS64 10:28:12 07/01/05 (5)
- Your point being? [nt] - Wellfed 12:40:17 07/01/05 (4)
- you stated that you did not tell Klaus to have the chip tested - BS64 04:05:48 07/02/05 (3)
- Did not... - Wellfed 21:00:50 07/02/05 (2)
- did so - BS64 12:31:04 07/03/05 (1)
- Literally speaking... - Wellfed 23:13:33 07/04/05 (0)
- Hijacker! nt - bjh 10:33:14 06/23/05 (3)
- Serious question... - Wellfed 14:19:04 06/23/05 (2)
- No seriously I was interested in Curl's response - bjh 17:02:25 06/23/05 (1)
- No, I don't... - Wellfed 21:54:40 06/23/05 (0)