Home Music Lane

It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes.

I'd like the Kleiber recording better. . .

. . . if DG's engineers (sorry - Tonmeisters!) showed a modicum of competence. Giulini is also mentioned below - but that performance is also subject to DG's engineering sabotage.

I also enjoy Big C's comment below about what the "best performance" is (somehow justified by Michael Steinberg's self-serving comments). I remember having to endure Steinberg's program notes for the SF Symphony when I reviewed regularly for one of the local papers years ago. Believe me, Steinberg has shown us nothing to justify his arrogance. (Quantity does not count!)

As for the Salonen/LAPO performance mentioned below, unless Big C has a different recording than the one I have, I would not ever classify an iTunes-derived performance as "hi-rez". (It's surprisingly good for lossy compression, but hi-rez it is not.) Maybe Clark got his recording from a non-iTunes source?

No, if you lean toward forward moving performances, then only the Reiner (mentioned below) and the Dorati performances combine drive, intensity, and excitement with engineering where the engineers know enough to stay out of the way. BTW, when the Dorati performance was first released in the early 60's, the critic for "The New Records" was evidently scandalized by the fact that Dorati took the second movement at Beethoven's indicated metronome marking, and wrote: "This isn't just bad Beethoven, this isn't Beethoven at all!"


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.