In Reply to: No shit, you over-reacted... posted by Commuteman on March 25, 2004 at 09:22:00:
Peter: ""That was a pretty nasty display of poor behavior.Then I can actually state that you and I finally came to agree on something??? :-)
That was why I apologized to John...Hi Peter..
Peter: ""Is it really impossible for us to stick to a technical discussion?""
Actually, the thread wasn't technical...it was more opinion, attitude, and expectations...
The one below on my double braid design and spreadsheet stayed the course rather nicely...I just wish my friend would hurry up and try the cables..as a backup plan, I'm trying to get someone else with a good system to try some, preferably here on Long Island, so I can also try to hear what is claimed... Meantime, doing some analysis to try to get past that LC product floor.
Peter: ""You keeping talking about wanting technical discussion, but you keep pouring gasoline on this fire.
My question is...why the fire...why the floobydust...why the cheerleading posts.
I assume you understand english, as well as the topics being discussed..But, as you stated once before, you tend to ignore what you choose to ignore, when it comes to JR and JC's attitudes and statements..you choose to call to task only those who you do not seem to agree with.
As far back as I go, you have never said ""That was a pretty nasty display of poor behavior"" to anyone who should have been told that...you just "ignore" it when you choose..
Cheers, John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Aggghhhh...didn't think that word would be allowed as a subject line - jneutron 09:51:51 03/25/04 (2)
- Ok, guilty as charged... - Commuteman 21:15:49 03/25/04 (1)
- Re: Ok, guilty as charged... - jneutron 05:57:00 03/26/04 (0)