Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

Re: Because they are not truly objective

JR: You yourself have been exposed to a great many of the legitimate theories and speculation concerning audio cables, much of it based on physics and science, and yet, later, pretend to have never heard of any of it.

Legitimate theory and speculation? Most of the speculation and theories (hypo's) you propose are pulled from a vast repetoire of LEGITIMATE physics and science.. Pulling various legitimate entities from physics and science, and applying them haphazardly to "cable sonics and theories", does not somehow manage to make the application of those entities legitimate..

So far, I've not seen him "pretend to never have heard it".. What he does do, is acknowledge by default, that you have not in any way, shown that any of your (I note that I am using you as the target, but mean it to be anyone who presents, untested, any speculation as gospel).. I would do the same.. Present us with some semblence of scientific rigor to your hypothetical stuff, we'll read it.. But don't expect us to believe it, based on your track record of lack of proof.


JR: ""One can only conclude either incredible stupidity, or that you are trolling.""

You missed an option....he doesn't believe you're "scientific" suppositions, because you do not provide any shred of scientific proof, and don't even give a good explanation scientifically speaking.

Such is the life of a Yaysayer???? Living in the world of undocumentable proofs? Expecting all to believe all mis-applications of science? Hiding under the umbrella of a forum where only believers can post??

Try testing rigorously, you're tenets...then provide us with the proof..here, on prop...

John


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.