Re: Why objective views are censored in Cable Asylum? - Dan Banquer

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Why objective views are censored in Cable Asylum? - Tony Montana 23:49:47 03/21/04 (79)

Steve Eddy baiting wannabees.... - PeAK 16:53:48 03/27/04 (15)

...some commentary on 11 responses... - PeAK 00:52:46 04/09/04 (3)

Re: ...some commentary on 11 responses... - Phil Tower 06:53:27 04/09/04 (2)

...precisely the point... - PeAK 08:38:11 04/09/04 (1)

Re: ...precisely the point... - Phil Tower 08:46:14 04/09/04 (0)

Re: Steve Eddy baiting wannabees.... - Jon Risch 20:29:49 03/28/04 (1)

Re: Steve Eddy baiting wannabees.... - Steve Eddy 23:47:50 03/28/04 (0)

You are probably quite correct. - Phil Tower 07:32:55 03/28/04 (8)

Re: You are probably quite correct. - john curl 00:15:27 03/29/04 (7)

Hi john - jneutron 14:14:37 03/29/04 (1)

Re: Hi john - john curl 15:19:22 03/29/04 (0)

Re: You are probably quite correct. - Dan Banquer 11:12:44 03/29/04 (2)

Re: You are probably quite correct. - john curl 15:20:34 03/29/04 (1)

Re: You are probably quite correct. - Phil Tower 16:00:48 03/29/04 (0)

Re: You are probably quite correct. - Phil Tower 05:13:24 03/29/04 (0)

Re: You are probably quite correct. - Steve Eddy 01:38:59 03/29/04 (0)

Because they are not truly objective - Jon Risch 18:24:49 03/23/04 (19)

Re: Because they are not truly objective - john curl 11:56:17 03/24/04 (15)

Where ya been John...you dissapeared after two people proved your tests wrong... - jneutron 14:17:28 03/24/04 (14)

JC - jneutron 06:57:47 03/25/04 (4)

No shit, you over-reacted... - Commuteman 09:22:00 03/25/04 (3)

Aggghhhh...didn't think that word would be allowed as a subject line - jneutron 09:51:51 03/25/04 (2)

Ok, guilty as charged... - Commuteman 21:15:49 03/25/04 (1)

Re: Ok, guilty as charged... - jneutron 05:57:00 03/26/04 (0)

What a crock! - Jon Risch 17:23:45 03/24/04 (8)

OH geeze, another voice from the cheap seats.. - jneutron 06:44:49 03/25/04 (6)

Re: OH geeze, another voice from the cheap seats.. - john curl 10:35:27 03/25/04 (5)

What's that? speak up...boy, those seats are really back there... - jneutron 11:38:31 03/25/04 (2)

OK,....uh ... sorry to interupt, but what websites, please.... - slope 15:35:41 03/25/04 (1)

Re: OK,....uh ... sorry to interupt, but what websites, please.... - jneutron 07:29:06 03/26/04 (0)

Re: OH geeze, another voice from the cheap seats.. - Steve Eddy 11:02:23 03/25/04 (1)

Waaaaaaiiiiiiiitttttaaaammminute Steve.. - jneutron 11:56:21 03/25/04 (0)

Re: What a crock! - Steve Eddy 18:42:29 03/24/04 (0)

Re: Because they are not truly objective - jneutron 10:18:24 03/24/04 (2)

Re: Because they are not truly objective - Tony Montana 18:24:30 03/24/04 (1)

He's allowed his opinions.. - jneutron 10:15:12 03/25/04 (0)

That post is little more than a troll - Rod M 08:29:54 03/23/04 (29)

Re: That post is little more than a troll - Phil Tower 03:22:31 03/24/04 (28)

Re: That post is little more than a troll - Rod M 08:26:11 03/24/04 (27)

Re: That post is little more than a troll - Phil Tower 08:48:41 03/24/04 (26)

Re: That post is little more than a troll - Rod M 17:37:26 03/24/04 (7)

Re: That post is little more than a troll - Phil Tower 08:00:30 03/25/04 (0)

Re: That post is little more than a troll - Steve Eddy 20:00:32 03/24/04 (5)

Little point to it. - Jon Risch 22:13:16 03/24/04 (1)

Re: Little point to it. - Steve Eddy 00:15:13 03/25/04 (0)

Re: That post is little more than a troll - Rod M 21:00:13 03/24/04 (2)

Can send me the porn pics? (nt) - newsjeff 18:08:19 03/25/04 (0)

Re: That post is little more than a troll - Steve Eddy 23:11:35 03/24/04 (0)

It isn't even true that... - kuribo 15:31:31 03/24/04 (17)

Re: It isn't even true that... - Jon Risch 16:57:32 03/24/04 (16)

BS? Far from it... - kuribo 06:58:32 03/25/04 (7)

Re: BS? Far from it... - Jon Risch 10:45:57 03/25/04 (6)

See Steve Eddy's post above, and let's consider .... - kuribo 16:35:28 03/25/04 (5)

Re: See Steve Eddy's post above, and let's consider .... - Jon Risch 20:54:11 03/25/04 (4)

Which dielectrics? Well, - kuribo 00:28:00 03/26/04 (2)

Anarchy, it is. (nt) - Jon Risch 22:48:12 03/26/04 (1)

Then VIVE ANARCHY! nt - Steve Eddy 23:42:33 03/26/04 (0)

Re: See Steve Eddy's post above, and let's consider .... - Steve Eddy 23:59:28 03/25/04 (0)

Opps Jon, you just stuck your foot in your mouth. - Tony Montana 17:47:59 03/24/04 (7)

If the shoe fits, wear it. (nt) - Jon Risch 19:20:59 03/24/04 (0)

Huh? - Rod M 18:11:33 03/24/04 (5)

Re: Huh? - Tony Montana 19:16:11 03/24/04 (4)

We agree! - Rod M 19:38:25 03/24/04 (3)

Re: We agree! - Steve Eddy 20:04:56 03/24/04 (2)

I must agree with Rod on one thing. - Tony Montana 22:46:53 03/24/04 (1)

Re: I must agree with Rod on one thing. - Steve Eddy 23:33:23 03/24/04 (0)

Do you really consider that an objective (as opposed to invective) post? - Commuteman 11:27:23 03/22/04 (1)

Well, that was just one example. - Tony Montana 18:14:42 03/22/04 (0)

Re: Why objective views are censored in Cable Asylum? - Ted Smith 00:08:22 03/22/04 (10)

Re: Why objective views are censored in Cable Asylum? - Phil Tower 09:36:23 03/22/04 (1)

Re: Why objective views are censored in Cable Asylum? - Steve Eddy 11:40:47 03/22/04 (0)

Re: Why objective views are censored in Cable Asylum? - Dan Banquer 07:00:43 03/22/04 (7)

Re: Why objective views are censored in Cable Asylum? - Steve Eddy 13:22:59 03/22/04 (2)

So do think it is a good idea.... - Tony Montana 18:28:45 03/22/04 (1)

Re: So do think it is a good idea.... - Steve Eddy 18:53:48 03/22/04 (0)

Nope - Ted Smith 12:37:40 03/22/04 (3)

Re: Nope - Dan Banquer 12:50:55 03/22/04 (2)

Nah - Ted Smith 12:55:57 03/22/04 (1)

Re: Nah - Dan Banquer 15:02:24 03/22/04 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Why objective views are censored in Cable Asylum? - Dan Banquer 07:00:43 03/22/04 (7)

Re: Why objective views are censored in Cable Asylum? - Steve Eddy 13:22:59 03/22/04 (2)

So do think it is a good idea.... - Tony Montana 18:28:45 03/22/04 (1)

Re: So do think it is a good idea.... - Steve Eddy 18:53:48 03/22/04 (0)

Nope - Ted Smith 12:37:40 03/22/04 (3)

Re: Nope - Dan Banquer 12:50:55 03/22/04 (2)

Nah - Ted Smith 12:55:57 03/22/04 (1)

Re: Nah - Dan Banquer 15:02:24 03/22/04 (0)