In Reply to: Hey Dan Banquer Ask John Curl Why He Liked Mr Cheevers Thesis! posted by thetubeguy1954 on June 14, 2006 at 08:12:09:
And that is that when comparing harmonic distortion in amplifiers, increasingly greater weight should be given to progressively higher harmonics because they are more irritating. This supposedly favors vacuum tube amplifiers because even though their total harmonic distortion is usually substantially higher than well designed ss amps, the distribution of harmonics is different and by this theory more favorable.And I did challenge John Curl;
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/prophead/messages/19533.html
And as with my last challenge, I've heard no reply so far. I asked him to demonstrate that regardless of the distribution of harmonics, the very low level of them in typical ss amplifies is audible in a type of test which would eliminate all other variables from skewing the results.
I for one did not say the thesis is outdated, I said the technology which would be favored by assuming the thesis is correct is outdated. And I also question both the method of the thesis and the relevance of its conclusion given the very low levels of harmonic distortion achieved in many well designed ss amps.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- We know the answer, he agrees with the thesis' basic premise - Soundmind 16:00:26 06/14/06 (54)
- To refute the study properly you would have to update it and improve the methodology - Norm 06:04:48 06/15/06 (0)
- Re: We know the answer, he agrees with the thesis' basic premise - thetubeguy1954 06:01:43 06/15/06 (1)
- Re: We know the answer, he agrees with the thesis' basic premise - Soundmind 06:30:46 06/15/06 (0)
- Re: We know the answer, he agrees with the thesis' basic premise - tomservo 19:34:52 06/14/06 (30)
- As I said below, I'm reading the thesis again. - Soundmind 20:51:29 06/14/06 (29)
- This Is The Whole Problem - thetubeguy1954 06:47:00 06/15/06 (18)
- And here's my problem with what people with your view say - Soundmind 07:24:45 06/15/06 (17)
- Re: And here's my problem with what people with your view say - thetubeguy1954 09:37:19 06/15/06 (4)
- Re: And here's my problem with what people with your view say - Soundmind 10:12:38 06/15/06 (3)
- I Disagree - thetubeguy1954 10:10:23 06/16/06 (2)
- Re: I Disagree - Soundmind 10:19:17 06/16/06 (1)
- I Agree - thetubeguy1954 12:55:12 06/16/06 (0)
- DBT again! - cheap-Jack 08:41:28 06/15/06 (1)
- Re: DBT again! - Soundmind 10:00:27 06/15/06 (0)
- Re: And here's my problem with what people with your view say - morricab 07:30:56 06/15/06 (9)
- Re: And here's my problem with what people with your view say - Soundmind 10:18:10 06/15/06 (8)
- Re: And here's my problem with what people with your view say - morricab 13:39:12 06/15/06 (6)
- Re: And here's my problem with what people with your view say - Soundmind 14:56:08 06/15/06 (5)
- Re: And here's my problem with what people with your view say - morricab 03:02:27 06/16/06 (4)
- Re: And here's my problem with what people with your view say - Soundmind 03:19:00 06/16/06 (3)
- Re: And here's my problem with what people with your view say - morricab 12:09:16 06/16/06 (2)
- Computer crash so here is the rest - morricab 12:29:43 06/16/06 (1)
- I clearly overestimated you - Soundmind 06:06:30 06/17/06 (1)
- Re: And here's my problem with what people with your view say - Dan Banquer 11:07:51 06/15/06 (0)
- Re: As I said below, I'm reading the thesis again. - morricab 03:45:11 06/15/06 (8)
- A Possible Test? - thetubeguy1954 07:07:15 06/15/06 (3)
- Re: A Possible Test? - morricab 07:33:28 06/15/06 (2)
- For those who don't have a paper copy of Stereophile... - andy_c 08:01:11 06/15/06 (1)
- Re: For those who don't have a paper copy of Stereophile... - morricab 08:21:48 06/15/06 (0)
- Re: As I said below, I'm reading the thesis again. - Soundmind 04:48:48 06/15/06 (3)
- Re: As I said below, I'm reading the thesis again. - morricab 07:25:38 06/15/06 (2)
- Re: As I said below, I'm reading the thesis again. - Soundmind 10:24:46 06/15/06 (1)
- Re: As I said below, I'm reading the thesis again. - morricab 03:11:49 06/16/06 (0)
- Thank You..... - Todd Krieger 21:40:24 06/14/06 (0)
- Re: We know the answer, he agrees with the thesis' basic premise - Dan Banquer 16:42:47 06/14/06 (19)
- Re: We know the answer, he agrees with the thesis' basic premise - Todd Krieger 21:14:04 06/14/06 (18)
- I'm surprised you took the time.............. - Dan Banquer 04:50:21 06/15/06 (17)
- Re: I'm surprised you took the time.............. - thetubeguy1954 07:13:03 06/15/06 (16)
- It took me less than ten minutes to find this..... - Dan Banquer 09:14:19 06/15/06 (15)
- Sorry about jumping in here.... - Tre' 13:03:29 06/15/06 (6)
- Re: Sorry about jumping in here.... - Dan Banquer 16:10:35 06/15/06 (5)
- Re: Sorry about jumping in here.... - Tre' 16:38:12 06/15/06 (4)
- Jump right in, - Dan Banquer 18:40:07 06/15/06 (3)
- Re: Jump right in, - morricab 03:09:28 06/16/06 (2)
- Re: Jump right in, - Dan Banquer 04:42:57 06/16/06 (1)
- Re: Jump right in, - morricab 07:47:13 06/16/06 (0)
- Re: It took me less than ten minutes to find this..... - thetubeguy1954 10:03:13 06/15/06 (7)
- Re: It took me less than ten minutes to find this..... - Dan Banquer 11:10:04 06/15/06 (6)
- Re: It took me less than ten minutes to find this..... - thetubeguy1954 13:34:13 06/15/06 (5)
- Re: It took me less than ten minutes to find this..... - Dan Banquer 13:42:30 06/15/06 (4)
- Re: It took me less than ten minutes to find this..... - john curl 15:03:42 06/15/06 (2)
- Re: It took me less than ten minutes to find this..... - Dan Banquer 16:08:09 06/15/06 (1)
- Re: It took me less than ten minutes to find this..... - john curl 17:27:46 06/15/06 (0)
- Re: It took me less than ten minutes to find this..... - thetubeguy1954 14:06:25 06/15/06 (0)