In Reply to: Hey Dan Banquer Ask John Curl Why He Liked Mr Cheevers Thesis! posted by thetubeguy1954 on June 14, 2006 at 08:12:09:
I preface my post with this: From people I respect and trust, I have been told that John Curl has produced excellent product. (Hi Phil) That said..JC has a history of accepting as fact many things which are entirely unsupported. To that end, many here can't be bothered questioning or badgering him when he either supports or refutes anything. They simply ignore him.
Go through the archives (as Dan asked), key words skin effect, fermi velocity, near superconducting..
He bolsters an inaccurately written article on skin effect, even though the technically "inaccurate" portions have been clearly shown incorrect. (when pushed, he cannot discuss the topic on his own.)
He incorrectly discusses quantum theory vs classical electron drift. (when pushed, he cannot discuss the topic on his own)
He talks of "near superconductors" as stated by others (friends). (I have experience with supers of the most advanced types, in magnets of the most advanced types, and can easily quash that garbage.) (Again, he cannot discuss the topic on his own, obviously a trend).
Clearly, he considers the source of such writings when embracing them, without regard to their technical accuracy.
Historically, I would certainly not feel it necessary to badger him over any technical paper..
I would ask him questions related to his proven abilities, however..again, based on the opinion of others with respect to his designs.
Cheers, John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Hello - jneutron 12:38:06 06/14/06 (23)
- Thanks.... - thetubeguy1954 13:30:14 06/15/06 (15)
- Re: Thanks.... - john curl 11:58:15 06/16/06 (13)
- Re: Thanks.... - jneutron 12:45:30 06/16/06 (12)
- Re: Thanks.... - john curl 13:14:07 06/16/06 (11)
- Re: Thanks.... - jneutron 13:41:01 06/16/06 (10)
- Re: Thanks.... - john curl 14:55:29 06/16/06 (9)
- Re: Thanks.... - jneutron 06:05:37 06/19/06 (0)
- Re: Thanks.... - john curl 15:11:31 06/16/06 (7)
- I'll add some more confusion here - jneutron 06:10:58 06/19/06 (6)
- Re: I'll add some more confusion here - john curl 09:30:03 06/19/06 (5)
- Re: I'll add some more confusion here - jneutron 10:08:57 06/19/06 (4)
- Re: I'll add some more confusion here - john curl 12:04:55 06/19/06 (3)
- Re: I'll add some more confusion here - jneutron 12:16:24 06/19/06 (2)
- Re: I'll add some more confusion here - john curl 13:20:02 06/19/06 (1)
- Re: I'll add some more confusion here - jneutron 13:38:19 06/19/06 (0)
- No problem - jneutron 07:00:30 06/16/06 (0)
- For The Life of Me..... - Todd Krieger 14:51:03 06/14/06 (2)
- Re: For The Life of Me..... - jneutron 06:40:44 06/15/06 (0)
- You can't be a 'winner' unless there are 'losers'....(nt) - mkuller 18:39:51 06/14/06 (0)
- John Curl... - mkuller 13:31:46 06/14/06 (3)
- Re: John Curl... - jneutron 06:19:16 06/15/06 (2)
- Historical perspective... - mkuller 11:06:49 06/15/06 (1)
- Re: Historical perspective... - jneutron 11:18:53 06/15/06 (0)