|
Speaker Asylum General speaker questions for audio and home theater. |
|
|
|
Speaker Asylum General speaker questions for audio and home theater. |
|
In Reply to: Dishonest engineer with an agenda (does a 10 second break-in test then jumps all the way to a 20 hour break-in test !) posted by Richard BassNut Greene on November 10, 2006 at 10:01:36:
Of course it is easy to pick apart holes in ANY testing methodology. The hard part is actually doing something about it. I don't see anyone making a profit from doing any of these tests, and further "ideal" testing to rule out every single possible variable would be a serious waste of time without external funding. I question your use of the term "dishonest".Also, where is your evidence of this:
"The very tiny T/S parameter changes after 20 hours may be within the tolerances of the measuring instruments. They are not going to be audible."People can post reports of DBT's but how often does anyone check the sensitivity of these tests?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Dishonest engineer with an agenda (does a 10 second break-in test then jumps all the way to a 20 hour break-in test - asull 10:52:21 11/10/06 (3)
- The term "Dishonest" is entirely appropriate - Soundmind 18:12:15 11/10/06 (2)
- Re: The term "Dishonest" is entirely appropriate - asull 19:16:27 11/10/06 (1)
- a 10 second break-in test followed by a second measurement after 20 hours break in ... is either dishonest, or stupid - Richard BassNut Greene 10:28:11 11/11/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
