In Reply to: Get out the nutshell of YOUR "protocols". posted by cheap-Jack on February 1, 2007 at 06:57:29:
Man wake up, you are asking open ended questionsI asked some basic closed questions and your response provided all that I need to ascertain the validity of your original comments. .
By the way, impedance matching is very important to me cos if the impedance of various components is well matched, a lot of mystique surrounding 'synergy' becomes redundant. And the very least I expect from someone comparing a tube amp to a SS amplifier is to the difference in output impedance into account. Without those protocols in place, you do not have a valid test, at least not one that is useful in discussion such as this.
"If you don't acquire the basic music instinct, & bank merely on
impedance & level matching & alike so called "protocols"It just so happens that those components are electrical, no amount of musical instinct precludes that fact. We are discussing audio amplifiers.
"Get real. Stop being a cult victim."Trying to pass off your comparison test which lacks even the basic controls as fact. And you call me a cult victim because I pointed that fact out to you, unsurprising really...
Music making the painting, recording it the photograph
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Get out the nutshell of YOUR "protocols". - theaudiohobby 07:28:34 02/01/07 (8)
- So let's talk technical - impedance "matching". - cheap-Jack 08:24:12 02/01/07 (7)
- Re: A pointless diversion - theaudiohobby 08:31:12 02/01/07 (6)
- So yu're backing off... - cheap-Jack 09:05:24 02/01/07 (5)
- Re: So yu're backing off... - theaudiohobby 09:16:18 02/01/07 (4)
- The last time I ask you: what are YOUR "most basic protocols"? - cheap-Jack 08:11:38 02/05/07 (3)
- Re: It is called dancing around the issue! - theaudiohobby 08:33:04 02/05/07 (2)
- Who is beating around the bush? You or me? - cheap-Jack 10:46:42 02/05/07 (1)
- Re: Who is beating around the bush? You! - theaudiohobby 01:49:33 02/06/07 (0)