In Reply to: Re: Does "logics" apply to music enjoyment ? posted by theaudiohobby on January 31, 2007 at 10:22:35:
Hi.So you listen with your music instinct or with your immpedance or level matching??
If you bank your music enjoyment on solely numbers & figures, this is a 100% sighted test - sighted on numbers. An even worse situation on sighted audition on the equipment, which is more relevant than sheer numbers.
My question to you: how good are your numbers relevent to music enjoyment? Why are you so sure the numbers you so measured are valid?
So tell me what are your "basic protocols" & how such man-made
hooks & crooks can determine how good or how bad it sound in dB or ohms?As I said, good music has already encompass whatever matchings involved. Supposing you were Hans Albert Einstein reborn todate, did I have to worry about your mathematical proficiency ???
What is your logics? Do I need to bother your relevant comments?
c-J
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Get real in music please. - cheap-Jack 10:54:34 01/31/07 (11)
- Re: Get real in music please. - theaudiohobby 01:14:49 02/01/07 (10)
- Get out the nutshell of YOUR "protocols". - cheap-Jack 06:57:29 02/01/07 (9)
- Re: Get out the nutshell of YOUR "protocols". - theaudiohobby 07:28:34 02/01/07 (8)
- So let's talk technical - impedance "matching". - cheap-Jack 08:24:12 02/01/07 (7)
- Re: A pointless diversion - theaudiohobby 08:31:12 02/01/07 (6)
- So yu're backing off... - cheap-Jack 09:05:24 02/01/07 (5)
- Re: So yu're backing off... - theaudiohobby 09:16:18 02/01/07 (4)
- The last time I ask you: what are YOUR "most basic protocols"? - cheap-Jack 08:11:38 02/05/07 (3)
- Re: It is called dancing around the issue! - theaudiohobby 08:33:04 02/05/07 (2)
- Who is beating around the bush? You or me? - cheap-Jack 10:46:42 02/05/07 (1)
- Re: Who is beating around the bush? You! - theaudiohobby 01:49:33 02/06/07 (0)