Re: P.S. - Dan Banquer - Propeller Head Plaza

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Bipolar vs MOSFET vs J-FET - thetubeguy1954 05:58:39 01/26/07 (121)

Ah, the linearity. Duh! - Ugly 10:27:46 01/29/07 (61)

Re: Ah, the linearity. Duh! - morricab 02:08:44 01/30/07 (59)

Re: Ah, the linearity. Duh! - john curl 18:50:45 01/30/07 (3)

It depends on what type of "tubes". - cheap-Jack 08:04:50 01/31/07 (0)

Re: Ah, the linearity. Duh! - Dan Banquer 05:41:58 01/31/07 (1)

If it sounds good, it doesn't matter to me solid or vacuum state. - cheap-Jack 08:11:53 01/31/07 (0)

Re: Ah, the linearity. Duh! - Ugly 10:53:40 01/30/07 (1)

Re: Here's one for you to try..... - hitsware 11:01:25 01/30/07 (0)

News Flash! - Dan Banquer 05:48:25 01/30/07 (52)

Re: News Flash! - morricab 03:36:52 01/31/07 (51)

Re: News Flash! - Dan Banquer 04:21:01 01/31/07 (50)

Re: News Flash! - bjh 08:54:10 01/31/07 (0)

Re: News Flash! - morricab 06:57:38 01/31/07 (48)

Re: News Flash! - Dan Banquer 07:47:55 01/31/07 (47)

Re: News Flash! - john curl 08:40:04 01/31/07 (30)

Re: News Flash! - theaudiohobby 10:39:26 01/31/07 (0)

P.S. - Dan Banquer 09:23:54 01/31/07 (27)

Re: P.S. - john curl 12:40:00 01/31/07 (23)

Re: P.S. - Dan Banquer 15:58:46 01/31/07 (21)

You're in good company - E-Stat 16:16:52 02/01/07 (20)

Fools rush in - Dan Banquer 04:54:08 02/02/07 (19)

Re: Fools rush in - john curl 12:03:42 02/02/07 (10)

Re: Fools rush in - Dan Banquer 09:08:07 02/03/07 (7)

Re: Fools rush in - john curl 12:05:38 02/03/07 (6)

Re: Fools rush in - Dan Banquer 12:18:10 02/03/07 (5)

P.S. - Dan Banquer 12:59:23 02/03/07 (4)

Re: P.S. - john curl 15:59:04 02/03/07 (3)

Boy, this is getting pathetic - E-Stat 08:04:50 02/04/07 (2)

Depends on which Webster you are referring to... - Wellfed 10:32:07 02/04/07 (1)

Not this one! - E-Stat 18:43:51 02/04/07 (0)

Thanks for the breath of fresh air in this stale discussion - E-Stat 16:45:43 02/02/07 (1)

Re: Thanks for the breath of fresh air in this stale discussion - john curl 17:41:18 02/03/07 (0)

They sure did! - E-Stat 06:11:43 02/02/07 (7)

As usual you............. - Dan Banquer 06:22:20 02/02/07 (6)

The VTLs are not problematic high feedback designs, Dan - E-Stat 06:32:08 02/02/07 (5)

You missed the point - Dan Banquer 06:37:08 02/02/07 (4)

You continue to leave out the important qualifier - E-Stat 06:52:11 02/02/07 (3)

P.S. - Dan Banquer 07:35:14 02/02/07 (1)

"The issue is not negative feedback and never really has been" - E-Stat 07:56:03 02/02/07 (0)

You really don't understand the issues involved. - Dan Banquer 07:07:18 02/02/07 (0)

Oh he's real, ... - bjh 12:43:04 01/31/07 (0)

Best cry I'd say, ... - bjh 09:56:03 01/31/07 (2)

Re: Best cry I'd say, ... - theaudiohobby 10:36:15 01/31/07 (1)

While purely speculation mind you, I'd be inclined to think that - bjh 11:51:10 01/31/07 (0)

Re: News Flash! - Dan Banquer 09:02:07 01/31/07 (0)

Re: News Flash! - morricab 08:39:10 01/31/07 (15)

Special announcement! - Dan Banquer 09:11:17 01/31/07 (14)

Re: Special announcement! - morricab 02:29:11 02/01/07 (11)

Re: Special announcement! - john curl 08:34:07 02/01/07 (1)

Re: Special announcement! - Dan Banquer 09:05:23 02/03/07 (0)

Re: Special announcement! - Dan Banquer 04:23:24 02/01/07 (8)

Re: Special announcement! - morricab 05:19:13 02/01/07 (7)

Re: Special announcement! - Dan Banquer 08:16:19 02/02/07 (6)

Re: Special announcement! - morricab 09:25:42 02/02/07 (5)

Re: Special announcement! - theaudiohobby 01:27:57 02/03/07 (0)

Re: Special announcement! - morricab 03:29:36 02/03/07 (3)

Re: Special announcement! - theaudiohobby 05:09:08 02/08/07 (0)

Re: Special announcement! - Dan Banquer 08:53:09 02/03/07 (1)

Re: Special announcement! - morricab 14:16:33 02/03/07 (0)

Re: Special announcement! - theaudiohobby 01:20:15 02/03/07 (0)

Re: Special announcement! - john curl 12:21:54 01/31/07 (1)

So What! nt. - Dan Banquer 04:25:01 02/01/07 (0)

Linearity? Ever try a triodes-driving-MOS-FET power amp? - cheap-Jack 11:20:04 01/29/07 (0)

However "properly designed" amps still sound different. - cheap-Jack 08:17:05 01/29/07 (10)

Re: However "properly designed" amps still sound different. - kerr 11:17:19 01/29/07 (9)

This one? - E-Stat 18:29:29 01/30/07 (2)

He was nothing if not colorful - kerr 05:42:04 01/31/07 (1)

Indeed - E-Stat 08:20:20 01/31/07 (0)

Don't bank too much on our ears alone. - cheap-Jack 11:29:30 01/29/07 (5)

I don't - kerr 05:44:42 01/31/07 (4)

IC pre-amps? Thanks but no thanks. (nt) - cheap-Jack 08:25:55 01/31/07 (3)

But it measured so well! Are you sure you don't want one? :) (nt) - kerr 09:24:37 01/31/07 (2)

All that glitters is not gold. (nt) - cheap-Jack 10:59:05 01/31/07 (1)

Not All That Wander Are Lost (nt) - thetubeguy1954 12:56:33 01/31/07 (0)

Re: Bipolar vs MOSFET vs J-FET - john curl 15:38:47 01/26/07 (6)

Re: Bipolar vs MOSFET vs J-FET - tomservo 18:06:33 01/26/07 (5)

Re: Bipolar vs MOSFET vs J-FET - kurt s 22:08:08 01/28/07 (0)

I don't know if I'd say signature but..... - Russ57 12:26:27 01/27/07 (3)

Re: I don't know if I'd say signature but..... - john curl 23:10:36 01/27/07 (2)

I thought active parts make the "largest" difference ? - cheap-Jack 08:54:17 01/29/07 (0)

Re: tantalum - hitsware 17:06:48 01/28/07 (0)

Re: Bipolar vs MOSFET vs J-FET - hitsware 08:52:20 01/26/07 (35)

Re: Bipolar vs MOSFET vs J-FET - Pat D 16:26:30 01/26/07 (34)

Re: Bipolar vs MOSFET vs J-FET - morricab 02:19:12 01/30/07 (33)

Re: Bipolar vs MOSFET vs J-FET - Pat D 12:40:20 01/30/07 (18)

Re: Bipolar vs MOSFET vs J-FET - morricab 03:26:58 01/31/07 (0)

Yes, sonics comes first. - cheap-Jack 13:04:24 01/30/07 (16)

Re: Questions for you. - theaudiohobby 01:28:16 01/31/07 (0)

Does "logics" apply to music enjoyment ? - cheap-Jack 09:13:30 01/31/07 (13)

Re: Does "logics" apply to music enjoyment ? - theaudiohobby 10:22:35 01/31/07 (12)

Get real in music please. - cheap-Jack 10:54:34 01/31/07 (11)

Re: Get real in music please. - theaudiohobby 01:14:49 02/01/07 (10)

Get out the nutshell of YOUR "protocols". - cheap-Jack 06:57:29 02/01/07 (9)

Re: Get out the nutshell of YOUR "protocols". - theaudiohobby 07:28:34 02/01/07 (8)

So let's talk technical - impedance "matching". - cheap-Jack 08:24:12 02/01/07 (7)

Re: A pointless diversion - theaudiohobby 08:31:12 02/01/07 (6)

So yu're backing off... - cheap-Jack 09:05:24 02/01/07 (5)

Re: So yu're backing off... - theaudiohobby 09:16:18 02/01/07 (4)

The last time I ask you: what are YOUR "most basic protocols"? - cheap-Jack 08:11:38 02/05/07 (3)

Re: It is called dancing around the issue! - theaudiohobby 08:33:04 02/05/07 (2)

Who is beating around the bush? You or me? - cheap-Jack 10:46:42 02/05/07 (1)

Re: Who is beating around the bush? You! - theaudiohobby 01:49:33 02/06/07 (0)

Re: Questions for you. - morricab 03:28:29 01/31/07 (0)

Another Newsflash! - Dan Banquer 05:51:34 01/30/07 (13)

Re: Another Newsflash! - morricab 03:33:42 01/31/07 (12)

More breaking news! - Dan Banquer 04:28:44 01/31/07 (11)

Tube amps commonly used NFB back then, too. (nt) - cheap-Jack 12:28:37 01/31/07 (1)

Re:yea but they were stable without it - hitsware 21:46:32 01/31/07 (0)

Re: More breaking news! - morricab 07:35:34 01/31/07 (8)

Please stay tuned for a special anouncement - Dan Banquer 08:24:56 01/31/07 (7)

Re: Please stay tuned for a special anouncement - morricab 08:56:34 01/31/07 (6)

Re: Please stay tuned for a special anouncement - Dan Banquer 09:07:59 01/31/07 (5)

Re: Please stay tuned for a special anouncement - morricab 02:42:34 02/01/07 (4)

Re: Please stay tuned for a special anouncement - Dan Banquer 04:29:02 02/01/07 (3)

Re: Please stay tuned for a special anouncement - morricab 05:22:29 02/01/07 (2)

You have shown your true colors - Dan Banquer 05:51:31 02/01/07 (1)

Re: You have shown your true colors - morricab 08:03:58 02/01/07 (0)

Suggests Transistor rolling... - lipmanl@hotmail.com 06:26:52 01/26/07 (1)

Re: Suggests Transistor rolling... - bwaslo 09:41:17 01/26/07 (0)

Re: Bipolar vs MOSFET vs J-FET - morricab 06:09:12 01/26/07 (2)

Thanks much! Very interesting study! - Al Sekela 12:10:52 01/26/07 (1)

Re: Bipolar vs MOSFET vs J-FET - tomservo 07:53:38 01/26/07 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: P.S. - Dan Banquer 15:58:46 01/31/07 (21)

You're in good company - E-Stat 16:16:52 02/01/07 (20)

Fools rush in - Dan Banquer 04:54:08 02/02/07 (19)

Re: Fools rush in - john curl 12:03:42 02/02/07 (10)

Re: Fools rush in - Dan Banquer 09:08:07 02/03/07 (7)

Re: Fools rush in - john curl 12:05:38 02/03/07 (6)

Re: Fools rush in - Dan Banquer 12:18:10 02/03/07 (5)

P.S. - Dan Banquer 12:59:23 02/03/07 (4)

Re: P.S. - john curl 15:59:04 02/03/07 (3)

Boy, this is getting pathetic - E-Stat 08:04:50 02/04/07 (2)

Depends on which Webster you are referring to... - Wellfed 10:32:07 02/04/07 (1)

Not this one! - E-Stat 18:43:51 02/04/07 (0)

Thanks for the breath of fresh air in this stale discussion - E-Stat 16:45:43 02/02/07 (1)

Re: Thanks for the breath of fresh air in this stale discussion - john curl 17:41:18 02/03/07 (0)

They sure did! - E-Stat 06:11:43 02/02/07 (7)

As usual you............. - Dan Banquer 06:22:20 02/02/07 (6)

The VTLs are not problematic high feedback designs, Dan - E-Stat 06:32:08 02/02/07 (5)

You missed the point - Dan Banquer 06:37:08 02/02/07 (4)

You continue to leave out the important qualifier - E-Stat 06:52:11 02/02/07 (3)

P.S. - Dan Banquer 07:35:14 02/02/07 (1)

"The issue is not negative feedback and never really has been" - E-Stat 07:56:03 02/02/07 (0)

You really don't understand the issues involved. - Dan Banquer 07:07:18 02/02/07 (0)