|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Nope, there's more to it than that. posted by Ted Smith on July 29, 2006 at 17:27:31:
Uh.. but how small does a buffer have to be that it underruns or
overflows in any short time period?If your system is more or less sane, output should start at say
50% buffer level, then it may grow or shrink, but if chosen big
enough it should take days until the first buffer error happens.I mean, the clocks are supposed to have the same speed. Even if
this is slightly not the case, buffers are big enough to compensate
it up for a seriously long time period.It may be a good idea to shutdown your systems after listening
to music, profoundly to the contrary of the "burning in"
principle we discussed in the other thread...Does this problem really exist? I have never heard of that, which
may suggest this is just a theoretical problem.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "burning in" considered harmful? - that's, my name 11:25:25 07/31/06 (5)
- Nieve buffering considered harmful - Ted Smith 12:10:01 07/31/06 (4)
- Re: Nieve buffering considered harmful - that's, my name 13:15:59 07/31/06 (3)
- Re: Nieve buffering considered harmful - that's, my name 13:37:18 07/31/06 (1)
- Hmm... - Ted Smith 13:53:36 07/31/06 (0)
- Nope, it's suposted to meen I mistiped on the spelling chekr [nt] - Ted Smith 13:27:22 07/31/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
