In Reply to: Re: Right :) posted by Bertie_Livingston on July 29, 2006 at 07:38:10:
HowdyIf you read between the lines at the Benchmark site it's obvious that they use ASRC. It's highly unlikely that they use a PLL since they upsample at the same time and they accept input from multiple sources all of which have different clocks, so how the heck are they going to not get behind on one clock while they get ahead on another? Also as I mentioned earlier John's post (actually his refinement a little further down the thread: http://www.audioasylum.com/audio/general/messages/443413.html) agrees with my characterization.
-Ted
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Right :) - Ted Smith 07:57:25 07/29/06 (17)
- The answer is "with a buffer". (nt) - Bertie_Livingston 15:13:38 07/29/06 (16)
- Nope, there's more to it than that. - Ted Smith 16:37:06 07/29/06 (15)
- Re: Nope, there's more to it than that. - Bertie_Livingston 17:23:42 07/29/06 (14)
- Re: Nope, there's more to it than that. - Ted Smith 17:27:31 07/29/06 (13)
- "burning in" considered harmful? - that's, my name 11:25:25 07/31/06 (5)
- Nieve buffering considered harmful - Ted Smith 12:10:01 07/31/06 (4)
- Re: Nieve buffering considered harmful - that's, my name 13:15:59 07/31/06 (3)
- Re: Nieve buffering considered harmful - that's, my name 13:37:18 07/31/06 (1)
- Hmm... - Ted Smith 13:53:36 07/31/06 (0)
- Nope, it's suposted to meen I mistiped on the spelling chekr [nt] - Ted Smith 13:27:22 07/31/06 (0)
- Not really - Bertie_Livingston 17:37:54 07/29/06 (6)
- That's because they work the way I said they do - Ted Smith 17:42:51 07/29/06 (5)
- "I apparently think they do?" - Bertie_Livingston 17:54:03 07/29/06 (4)
- Re: "I apparently think they do?" - Ted Smith 18:06:25 07/29/06 (3)
- Re: "I apparently think they do?" - Bertie_Livingston 18:48:12 07/29/06 (2)
- Re: "I apparently think they do?" - Mel 16:39:43 07/30/06 (1)
- Absolutely (nt) - Bertie_Livingston 05:01:51 07/31/06 (0)