In Reply to: Nope, there's more to it than that. posted by Ted Smith on July 29, 2006 at 16:37:06:
As I mentioned the drift is minimal because clocks are very accurate in practice. You don't need a huge buffer to make this in practice negligible. Ideally you would have a large enough buffer and pay attention only to one clock next to the DAC. I think Chord had a unit that did that.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Nope, there's more to it than that. - Bertie_Livingston 17:23:42 07/29/06 (14)
- Re: Nope, there's more to it than that. - Ted Smith 17:27:31 07/29/06 (13)
- "burning in" considered harmful? - that's, my name 11:25:25 07/31/06 (5)
- Nieve buffering considered harmful - Ted Smith 12:10:01 07/31/06 (4)
- Re: Nieve buffering considered harmful - that's, my name 13:15:59 07/31/06 (3)
- Re: Nieve buffering considered harmful - that's, my name 13:37:18 07/31/06 (1)
- Hmm... - Ted Smith 13:53:36 07/31/06 (0)
- Nope, it's suposted to meen I mistiped on the spelling chekr [nt] - Ted Smith 13:27:22 07/31/06 (0)
- Not really - Bertie_Livingston 17:37:54 07/29/06 (6)
- That's because they work the way I said they do - Ted Smith 17:42:51 07/29/06 (5)
- "I apparently think they do?" - Bertie_Livingston 17:54:03 07/29/06 (4)
- Re: "I apparently think they do?" - Ted Smith 18:06:25 07/29/06 (3)
- Re: "I apparently think they do?" - Bertie_Livingston 18:48:12 07/29/06 (2)
- Re: "I apparently think they do?" - Mel 16:39:43 07/30/06 (1)
- Absolutely (nt) - Bertie_Livingston 05:01:51 07/31/06 (0)