In Reply to: The "real" jj posted by E-Stat on March 4, 2006 at 20:22:40:
"That ID" being 'jj'. As you are also aware, if you bothered to show dilligence, that it is no longer available, because somebody else has registered "JJ" and the site rejects 'jj' as a result, insisting that it's a duplicate nickname. Don't get me wrong, they're entitled, and they did, and that's how it is. 'jj' is gone forever.As you are further aware, if you bothered to show dilligence, there are about 40,000 people, give or take, behind the IP you're raving on about, and that your illicit insinuations are either utterly negligent or purely malicious. And I don't mean an exclusive "or" there, I could well believe both. Your game here is simple, you hope to take down two opponents with one false insinuation. You simply want to get rid of the people who give you a good comeuppance, and that much less often than you really deserve it. You didn't do due dilligence, did you?
Well?
Any time you can contact me at home.comcast.net/~retired_old_jj and find out if it's me. Did you do that? Nope. You didn't. That url is in at least one other of my postings above, so don't complain you didn't know it. Oh, wait, were you dilligent? Maybe not.
Send me mail, now. Put your email where your mouth is.
STAND AND DELIVER, E-Stat. Stand and Deliver.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- As you are well aware, I deleted that ID... - real_jj 23:42:03 03/04/06 (10)
- Why do you think folks are well aware - E-Stat 06:17:37 03/05/06 (9)
- So, you aren't dilligent. - real_jj 13:37:57 03/05/06 (8)
- Pompous as usual - it IS you! - E-Stat 19:11:04 03/05/06 (7)
- Some things just don't change. - real_jj 21:29:48 03/05/06 (6)
- Your reply perfectly illustrates my point - E-Stat 14:29:49 03/06/06 (5)
- Here we go again... - real_jj 17:21:46 03/06/06 (4)
- Most folks would have just said - E-Stat 17:42:57 03/06/06 (3)
- Most people might have asked, not accused... - real_jj 18:43:14 03/06/06 (2)
- I most certainly did. Read my first post again (hint: look for the ?) - E-Stat 05:19:12 03/07/06 (1)
- Riiiight - real_jj 10:48:45 03/07/06 (0)