In Reply to: I did answer the question... And y'all lied twice in your "reply". posted by Silver Eared John on February 10, 2006 at 14:39:27:
...you're still acting like an a**hole.I asked two simple questions:
>In designing "lossless" codecs, like MPEG4 (Apple Lossless), are listening tests used, or are the files simply compared?>
and
>Have any artifacts been identified from the "uncompression" function of lossless codecs?>
Your response was:
>I said: Lossless, as far as I know, means that the files are bitwise identical input and output.>Fine, bits is bits.
But you didn't really answer EITHER question.
They were specifically about *listening* and *hearing*.
Who's lying now?
How can you be a so-called expert at anything if you can't even read?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Apparently... - mkuller 15:46:40 02/10/06 (23)
- Remember the SNL skit with Martin Short - E-Stat 18:43:48 02/10/06 (21)
- So Estat chooses to lie, too... - Silver Eared John 21:30:50 02/10/06 (20)
- Seriously, John - E-Stat 09:24:59 02/11/06 (18)
- As expected, he failed to address the questions, which you laid out specifically and mannerly.. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:08:30 02/14/06 (1)
- baloney - Silver Eared John 10:27:18 02/14/06 (0)
- Seriously, E-Stat - Silver Eared John 13:51:24 02/13/06 (15)
- Why didn't you just say so or just clarify your statement? - E-Stat 14:47:59 02/13/06 (14)
- Sorry, there, missed the relevant content... - Silver Eared John 15:06:36 02/15/06 (12)
- Lemme 'splain sumtin' to ya Jawn - E-Stat 16:57:52 02/15/06 (11)
- Yeah, I just said that. - Silver Eared John 18:08:59 02/15/06 (10)
- But y'all's not a gittin' the idee hyer - E-Stat 18:46:49 02/15/06 (9)
- Y'all need to study a bit, fella - Silver Eared John 10:37:48 02/16/06 (8)
- Clouding the issue with facts? - Dan Banquer 14:16:46 02/16/06 (4)
- Oh, geeze, man... - Silver Eared John 15:41:52 02/16/06 (3)
- Re: Oh, heck John; - Dan Banquer 15:53:31 02/16/06 (2)
- Y'all think? - Silver Eared John 17:08:01 02/16/06 (1)
- Got it. - Dan Banquer 05:30:51 02/17/06 (0)
- C'mon John - E-Stat 11:32:39 02/16/06 (2)
- Yeah, it does require some "computational balls"... - Silver Eared John 15:40:04 02/16/06 (1)
- Right (nt) - E-Stat 15:56:46 02/16/06 (0)
- Well, shucks, who threw the first stone, stat? - Silver Eared John 18:57:09 02/13/06 (0)
- Not me. nt - Dan Banquer 04:27:18 02/11/06 (0)
- I answered the question, y'all... - Silver Eared John 16:58:27 02/10/06 (0)