In Reply to: Yours isn't so great either posted by racerguy on September 20, 2006 at 19:28:11:
<< Christine wrote that "recent analysis suggests that jitter needs to be below 20ps to be truly inaudible." Nowhere did she say that anything she had seen measured that low. >>Uhhh...
Help me out here. How do you think the "recent analysis" determined that 20 pS was a threshold of audibility? Do you think they just guessed at the jitter levels? Or do you think they somehow measured them?
I'm pretty sure they measured them. And I'm pretty sure that they didn't use the Miller test suite. So, like I said, Christine was comparing apples to oranges when she said that "When you consider that recent analysis suggests that jitter needs to be below 20ps [AS MEASURED WITH ANOTHER TEST SYSTEM] to be truly inaudible, the above figures [ALL MEASURED USING THE MILLER TEST SUITE] suggest that ALL curent hi-rez players are at least an order of magnitude above ideal."
My reading comprehension is just fine, thank you.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Uhhh... - Charles Hansen 19:55:38 09/20/06 (9)
- Re: Uhhh... - Christine Tham 20:34:10 09/20/06 (3)
- Re: Uhhh... - Charles Hansen 20:57:09 09/20/06 (2)
- Re: Uhhh... - Christine Tham 22:18:51 09/20/06 (1)
- As Woody Allen would say... - Charles Hansen 22:32:48 09/20/06 (0)
- Still no good - racerguy 20:32:55 09/20/06 (4)
- Re: Still no good - Charles Hansen 20:53:31 09/20/06 (3)
- Whatever you say, Charles - racerguy 05:25:56 09/21/06 (2)
- Re: Whatever you say, Charles - Charles Hansen 07:24:03 09/21/06 (1)
- Re: Whatever you say, Charles - racerguy 07:50:06 09/21/06 (0)