|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
|
|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
In Reply to: Comparison of various transports posted by Geforce on September 19, 2006 at 21:47:16:
I'm not saying that one won't last longer than the other or one sounds better than the other, but vs. paying big bucks (to someone who has a financial interest), a Gingko audio platform (www.gingkoaudio.com or I'm sure lots of other well designed things) can isolate vibrations if that is a concern in the playback chain. There's no doubt from the photos as to which transport is built best. I've owned stuff in the past that was built really well (e.g. Proceed PMDT - which also sounded good on CD with a DAC). While Gingko products are not cheap, they are far less than $12k.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Comparison of various transports - Geforce 21:47:16 09/19/06 (123)
- Computer based playback vs VRDS-NEO - SoftwireEngineer 16:20:55 09/21/06 (6)
- Re: Computer based playback vs VRDS-NEO - Charles Hansen 16:34:56 09/21/06 (5)
- Re: Computer based playback vs VRDS-NEO - Retsel 11:26:33 09/22/06 (2)
- Re: Computer based playback vs VRDS-NEO - Charles Hansen 12:04:54 09/22/06 (1)
- I have heard the difference - Sordidman 15:31:35 09/22/06 (0)
- Re: Computer based playback vs VRDS-NEO - prad 23:49:18 09/21/06 (1)
- Read about jitter [nt] - Ted Smith 13:49:23 09/22/06 (0)
- Re: Comparison of various transports - Lowrider 00:01:07 09/21/06 (0)
- Why was one entire branch of this thread deleted? - Charles Hansen 20:59:14 09/20/06 (12)
- I didn't delete anything... - Chris Garrett 18:36:05 09/21/06 (0)
- Probably because... - racerguy 05:23:48 09/21/06 (2)
- OK, now I understand... - Chris Garrett 18:41:32 09/21/06 (1)
- its not prod or prawn. its prad. n i thot i was the only 1 wif spelling impediment. (nt) - prad 19:59:12 09/21/06 (0)
- Re: Why was one entire branch of this thread deleted? - Alex Peychev 02:02:38 09/21/06 (5)
- it's because jeme has been banned . . . . - lazarus28 09:08:05 09/21/06 (4)
- Re: it's because jeme has been banned . . . . - prad 21:26:21 09/21/06 (1)
- your impediment - tunenut 17:31:04 09/24/06 (1)
- Thank you, as least somebody understands... - Chris Garrett 18:49:07 09/21/06 (1)
- Sorry folks, I didn't notice. - robert young 19:03:03 09/21/06 (0)
- Seems to be a lot of that happening here lately! (nt) - JCS 01:31:55 09/21/06 (0)
- simply becos tolerance is simply lacking in some places (nt) - prad 21:59:13 09/20/06 (1)
- This reminds me of... - racerguy 16:31:13 09/20/06 (2)
- Normally, I would think that that would be a great analogy - Sordidman 16:36:45 09/20/06 (1)
- See below (nt) - racerguy 16:44:03 09/20/06 (0)
- Re: Comparison of various transports - not definitive... - Retsel 12:25:36 09/20/06 (97)
- When the build quality jibes with the sound quality - Sordidman 13:37:07 09/20/06 (96)
- Hey, I'm just happy that you wrote "jibes" instead of "jives!" - bublitchki 01:04:45 09/23/06 (0)
- Re: When the build quality jibes with the sound quality - Retsel 12:10:02 09/21/06 (3)
- I am not sure if Esoteric makes it's new transport - Sordidman 12:36:37 09/21/06 (2)
- Re: I am not sure if Esoteric makes it's new transport - Retsel 14:00:33 09/21/06 (1)
- I see your point: but I didn't say that it was "beefier" - Sordidman 16:07:55 09/21/06 (0)
- Re: When the build quality jibes with the sound quality - racerguy 16:43:27 09/20/06 (90)
- Re: When the build quality jibes with the sound quality - Alex Peychev 02:18:18 09/21/06 (0)
- That is truly sad ... - Christine Tham 18:15:03 09/20/06 (88)
- OMG Christine!!! - Alex Peychev 01:39:37 09/21/06 (26)
- There is no "bit clock" coming out of the VRDS Neo - Charles Hansen 07:12:57 09/21/06 (21)
- Re: There is no "bit clock" coming out of the VRDS Neo - Alex Peychev 09:50:19 09/21/06 (20)
- Re: There is no "bit clock" coming out of the VRDS Neo - Charles Hansen 10:02:46 09/21/06 (14)
- Re: There is no "bit clock" coming out of the VRDS Neo - Alex Peychev 10:25:06 09/21/06 (13)
- Re: There is no "bit clock" coming out of the VRDS Neo - Charles Hansen 10:56:08 09/21/06 (12)
- Re: There is no "bit clock" coming out of the VRDS Neo - Alex Peychev 11:49:57 09/21/06 (11)
- Alex, two questions... - Allen Wright 14:45:16 09/21/06 (3)
- Re: Alex, two questions... - Alex Peychev 15:46:18 09/21/06 (2)
- Disagree - Charles Hansen 16:29:42 09/21/06 (1)
- Re: Disagree - Alex Peychev 16:41:10 09/21/06 (0)
- Re: There is no "bit clock" coming out of the VRDS Neo - Charles Hansen 12:47:49 09/21/06 (6)
- Re: There is no "bit clock" coming out of the VRDS Neo - Alex Peychev 15:23:35 09/21/06 (1)
- Re: There is no "bit clock" coming out of the VRDS Neo - Charles Hansen 16:26:18 09/21/06 (0)
- Re: clock path to the chips - Retsel 14:47:35 09/21/06 (3)
- Re: clock path to the chips - Alex Peychev 16:35:14 09/21/06 (2)
- Re: Difference that the transport makes - Retsel 11:05:57 09/22/06 (0)
- Re: clock path to the chips - Charles Hansen 19:32:22 09/21/06 (0)
- I don't know what Stereophile is doing with their measurement scheme - Sordidman 10:00:48 09/21/06 (4)
- Exactly - Charles Hansen 10:46:18 09/21/06 (2)
- Well yes and no...... - Alex Peychev 11:23:05 09/21/06 (1)
- Re: Well yes and no...... - Charles Hansen 12:08:06 09/21/06 (0)
- That is correct...... - Alex Peychev 10:12:12 09/21/06 (0)
- Re: OMG Christine!!! - racerguy 05:19:38 09/21/06 (3)
- Re: OMG Christine!!! - Alex Peychev 10:05:17 09/21/06 (2)
- Re: OMG Christine!!! - racerguy 16:45:15 09/21/06 (1)
- Re: OMG Christine!!! - Alex Peychev 18:33:11 09/21/06 (0)
- You forgot the SCD-1 at 146.8 ps(1999)nt - Guss2 18:37:12 09/20/06 (1)
- Kick ass baby.... - Chris Garrett 02:45:23 09/21/06 (0)
- A little knowledge is a dangerous thing - Charles Hansen 18:32:35 09/20/06 (56)
- A plague on both your houses - Pacman 10:56:08 09/21/06 (5)
- It's OK that the original subject has been changed, but... - Sordidman 12:40:57 09/21/06 (4)
- Your correct but... - Pacman 14:26:08 09/21/06 (3)
- Re: Your correct but... - Christine Tham 02:44:12 09/22/06 (2)
- Oh, really? - Charles Hansen 06:35:27 09/22/06 (1)
- See my other reply - Christine Tham 15:37:26 09/22/06 (0)
- Completely agree - Christine Tham 18:44:04 09/20/06 (49)
- Your lack of reading comprehension is truly astounding - Charles Hansen 19:09:37 09/20/06 (48)
- See racerguy's post - Christine Tham 20:23:52 09/20/06 (35)
- And now it's time for me to pick on YOU - racerguy 20:46:55 09/20/06 (28)
- Re: And now it's time for me to pick on YOU - Christine Tham 21:05:11 09/20/06 (27)
- Thanks, but you still didn't address the issue - racerguy 05:34:59 09/21/06 (1)
- Re: Thanks, but you still didn't address the issue - Christine Tham 22:48:39 09/21/06 (0)
- Once again you are showing your lack of knowledge - Charles Hansen 21:29:53 09/20/06 (24)
- Re: Once again you are showing your lack of knowledge - Christine Tham 21:53:30 09/20/06 (23)
- Don't be coy, give us an example - Charles Hansen 22:01:00 09/20/06 (22)
- Well, I would ... - Christine Tham 22:34:42 09/20/06 (21)
- Oh, right... - Charles Hansen 22:42:59 09/20/06 (20)
- "People buy from people they like." - String Section 23:13:41 09/20/06 (4)
- Re: "People buy from people they like." - junvel 00:57:31 09/24/06 (0)
- Re: "People buy from people they like." - graemme 14:25:15 09/21/06 (0)
- Re: "People buy from people they like." - Charles Hansen 23:36:08 09/20/06 (1)
- Re: "People buy from people they like." - sentinel90125 07:34:43 09/22/06 (0)
- What audience? - Christine Tham 23:00:08 09/20/06 (14)
- Were all reading.. - SnaggS 21:38:03 09/21/06 (1)
- Send me private email (nt) - Christine Tham 22:49:40 09/21/06 (0)
- Re: What audience? - The Sound Guy 06:24:56 09/21/06 (9)
- I hope you will understand - Christine Tham 02:41:20 09/22/06 (8)
- OK - The_Sound_Guy 00:07:49 09/28/06 (0)
- Oh, really? - Charles Hansen 06:34:16 09/22/06 (6)
- Re: Oh, really? - Christine Tham 15:36:49 09/22/06 (5)
- Just a little bit more background ... - Christine Tham 16:26:51 09/22/06 (0)
- This is why it is hard to take you seriously - Charles Hansen 16:18:48 09/22/06 (3)
- Re: This is why it is hard to take you seriously - Christine Tham 16:41:17 09/22/06 (2)
- Just one final hint ... - Christine Tham 17:03:01 09/22/06 (1)
- Re: Just one final hint ... - Lin Minh 08:39:10 09/24/06 (0)
- Re: What audience? - Charles Hansen 23:17:42 09/20/06 (1)
- Re: What audience? - Christine Tham 00:33:11 09/21/06 (0)
- Well, let's see here... - Charles Hansen 20:43:50 09/20/06 (5)
- Re: Well, let's see here... - Christine Tham 22:09:50 09/20/06 (4)
- Oh, OK, I believe you now - Charles Hansen 22:38:29 09/20/06 (3)
- And your point is? - Christine Tham 22:57:42 09/20/06 (2)
- Re: And your point is? - Charles Hansen 23:09:05 09/20/06 (1)
- Wow ... - Christine Tham 00:30:58 09/21/06 (0)
- Yours isn't so great either - racerguy 19:28:11 09/20/06 (11)
- Thanks - saved me from typing (nt) - Christine Tham 20:12:53 09/20/06 (0)
- Uhhh... - Charles Hansen 19:55:38 09/20/06 (9)
- Re: Uhhh... - Christine Tham 20:34:10 09/20/06 (3)
- Re: Uhhh... - Charles Hansen 20:57:09 09/20/06 (2)
- Re: Uhhh... - Christine Tham 22:18:51 09/20/06 (1)
- As Woody Allen would say... - Charles Hansen 22:32:48 09/20/06 (0)
- Still no good - racerguy 20:32:55 09/20/06 (4)
- Re: Still no good - Charles Hansen 20:53:31 09/20/06 (3)
- Whatever you say, Charles - racerguy 05:25:56 09/21/06 (2)
- Re: Whatever you say, Charles - Charles Hansen 07:24:03 09/21/06 (1)
- Re: Whatever you say, Charles - racerguy 07:50:06 09/21/06 (0)
- Re: That is truly sad ... - racerguy 18:32:13 09/20/06 (1)
- Re: That is truly sad ... - Christine Tham 18:38:57 09/20/06 (1)
- Re: Comparison of various transports - HighEndWire 07:30:09 09/20/06 (0)
Follow Ups
- Re: Comparison of various transports - HighEndWire 07:30:09 09/20/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
