In Reply to: Your lack of reading comprehension is truly astounding posted by Charles Hansen on September 20, 2006 at 19:09:37:
I note that Christine wrote that "recent analysis suggests that jitter needs to be below 20ps to be truly inaudible." Nowhere did she say that anything she had seen measured that low.She did mention a device that has been claimed to be that low, but she clearly said she has seen no substantiation.
I know you two like to argue, and I don't want to get in the way of it if it's good entertainment ;-) but both of you need to READ those arguments MORE THOROUGHLY.
That is all.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Yours isn't so great either - racerguy 19:28:11 09/20/06 (11)
- Thanks - saved me from typing (nt) - Christine Tham 20:12:53 09/20/06 (0)
- Uhhh... - Charles Hansen 19:55:38 09/20/06 (9)
- Re: Uhhh... - Christine Tham 20:34:10 09/20/06 (3)
- Re: Uhhh... - Charles Hansen 20:57:09 09/20/06 (2)
- Re: Uhhh... - Christine Tham 22:18:51 09/20/06 (1)
- As Woody Allen would say... - Charles Hansen 22:32:48 09/20/06 (0)
- Still no good - racerguy 20:32:55 09/20/06 (4)
- Re: Still no good - Charles Hansen 20:53:31 09/20/06 (3)
- Whatever you say, Charles - racerguy 05:25:56 09/21/06 (2)
- Re: Whatever you say, Charles - Charles Hansen 07:24:03 09/21/06 (1)
- Re: Whatever you say, Charles - racerguy 07:50:06 09/21/06 (0)