|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: An "Answer", but not an explanation. posted by AJinFLA on November 7, 2006 at 18:46:44:
Care to explain why the "easily" identified wire/cable/cord/widgetX evaporates into "not so easily" identified red faced Audiphool wire/cable/cord/widgetX in the presence of a horses**t detector aka ABX box?"Sound" statistics require the use of controls, not assumptions, to assure that a test is capable of answering the intended question(s). The operating assumption is that the ABX boxes themselves introduce no audible changes. I have yet to see a test of the box itself. Frank Van Alstine, one engineer who does not endorse aftermarket cabling, points out some issues with using the box:
The big name non-lunatic fringe wire manufacturers could have their cake and eat it too.
Recall the story of a very well established and successful computer company who in 1980 originally thought that the PC would have a limited audience mostly with computer professionals.
rw
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Sure - E-Stat 06:17:49 11/08/06 (3)
- Re: Sure - Soundmind 08:42:40 11/08/06 (2)
- Theoretically yes, but - cheap-Jack 08:58:30 11/08/06 (1)
- Re: Theoretically yes, but - Soundmind 09:22:23 11/08/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
