In Reply to: Been there, heard that.... inductive reasoning posted by pmkap on November 6, 2006 at 11:12:26:
Hi.Any shielding wrapped around a conductor generates conductor-to-shielding capacitance & its inversely proportional to the Log10 of the ratio of the inner diameter of the shielding & the diameter of the conductor inside the shield sleeve.
For multi-conductor cable, like a 3-wire power cord, more capacitances are generated: inter-capacitance btwn EACH condudctor & the common shielding as explained above, plus capacitances betwn EACH conductor.
That's why I try the utmost to refrain from using any shielding on my DIY ICs & power cords. I heard reports on shielding impairing sound bigtime.
Hence you can detect the sonic difference of the two different power cords you tested due to the different combined capacitances caused by the different spacing of the shielding of each cord.
This scientifically explanable, not voodoos.
Of course, capacitance is only one of the factors that affect the sonics of a cable.
Any magnetic ring snapped onto any conductor will change the conductor's free-space impedance: 377-ohm (ratio of electro-magnetic fields E/H). More variance from this 377R impedance will prevent the conductor from acting as an antenna in picking up the unwanted EMI/RFI. This is how those snapped on ferrite suppressors work on a cable.
By sliding the ring along the conductor, or cord to a critical position to provide the max E/H mismatching, the best EMI/RFI suppression can be achieved. I have read reports on its pronounced sonic effect on an audio system via a power cord, ICs etc etc.
I am using those ferrite ring wrapped onto my unshielded power cords,
& ICs.c-J
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Shielding is capacitive, not "inductive", - cheap-Jack 12:34:41 11/06/06 (29)
- Re: Shielding is capacitive, not "inductive", - Soundmind 05:04:38 11/07/06 (28)
- Apple vs orange, again. My Newyorker friend. - cheap-Jack 08:37:12 11/07/06 (7)
- Re: Apple vs orange, again. My Newyorker friend. - AJinFLA 16:27:44 11/07/06 (6)
- Answer - E-Stat 17:54:12 11/07/06 (5)
- An "Answer", but not an explanation. - AJinFLA 18:46:44 11/07/06 (4)
- Sure - E-Stat 06:17:49 11/08/06 (3)
- Re: Sure - Soundmind 08:42:40 11/08/06 (2)
- Theoretically yes, but - cheap-Jack 08:58:30 11/08/06 (1)
- Re: Theoretically yes, but - Soundmind 09:22:23 11/08/06 (0)
- Re: Shielding is capacitive, not "inductive", - tomservo 07:47:07 11/07/06 (19)
- Re: Shielding is capacitive, not "inductive", - Soundmind 08:57:55 11/08/06 (0)
- I remember sitting next to a NASA accountant on a flight once - E-Stat 13:32:08 11/07/06 (0)
- Prove your "fact" please. - cheap-Jack 13:15:30 11/07/06 (15)
- Re: Prove your "fact" please. - tomservo 16:57:32 11/07/06 (6)
- Let me prove it for you - precisely. - cheap-Jack 08:45:09 11/09/06 (5)
- Lost in the minutia - tomservo 09:19:49 11/09/06 (4)
- Accuracy is not "minutia". - cheap-Jack 07:57:44 11/10/06 (3)
- Re: Accuracy is not "minutia". - tomservo 08:49:28 11/10/06 (2)
- Apple vs orange, again. - cheap-Jack 11:49:43 11/13/06 (1)
- Re: Apple vs orange, again. - tomservo 06:29:31 11/15/06 (0)
- Tom is correct on that point. - jneutron 14:02:01 11/07/06 (0)
- How 'bout first you prove... - Steve Eddy 13:28:44 11/07/06 (6)
- Apple vs orange, bud. - cheap-Jack 13:42:16 11/07/06 (5)
- Re: Apple vs orange, bud. - Steve Eddy 08:39:35 11/08/06 (4)
- You are confused with the basic. - cheap-Jack 09:26:47 11/08/06 (3)
- Re: You are confused with the basic. - Steve Eddy 11:20:05 11/08/06 (1)
- Don't be a blockhead. Talk sense, please. - cheap-Jack 13:26:39 11/08/06 (0)
- PS: I'm still awaiting Tom's substantiation on his objective claim. - jneutron 10:14:38 11/08/06 (0)
- Re: Shielding is capacitive, not "inductive", - Soundmind 08:36:13 11/07/06 (0)