|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: I cannot understand your perceptions of the scientific method; perhaps ignorance posted by Norm on June 6, 2006 at 15:11:55:
S**T or get off the pot.You lie when you insinuate that I imply in any form that anything is set in stone. As I have said, in these threads, many times that all science is provisional, the evidence that you lie outright is presently with us.
You lie, furthermore, when you insinuate that the expert summary is other than that DBT's or cognates are necessary for scientific testing of claims such as are made here.
When you rail incompetently about the scientific method, you forget that falsifiability is a keystone of the scientific method, and that no sighted test is even falsifiable, in that it is impossible to assert in any such test that the effect was due to the claimed sensory modality.
In arguing against blind testing, you show a basic contempt and and ignorance for the very keystone of the scientific method, for the work of Popper and Hume, and for the very science that brings you audio in the first place.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Sorry, accusing me of "ignorance" about the scientific method is another professional accusation - real_jj 15:34:32 06/06/06 (2)
- If you say so. - Norm 18:14:16 06/06/06 (1)
- Please explain how I can discount, using evidence, inadvertant self-influence in a sighted test. - real_jj 18:29:26 06/06/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
