In Reply to: OMG he's back posted by Soundmind on June 3, 2006 at 14:42:33:
they are imagining differences they claim to hear in other circumstances. This is a testable hypothesis where we might vary the duration of the test, the number of people present, the music being played, even assessing variations among people. I doubt greatly whether DBTesting of same/different conditions validly assesses how individuals make their choices of components. Until there is such research, DBTesting does not discriminate between real and imagined difference but rather between highly structured and quick listening and typical listening.But in reality I doubt if even those enamored with DBT follow their reasoning when buying. Given their grave concern about being ripped off, I suspect they buy the cheapest and rationalize that there is no need to buy anything better as people would not be able to really hear any improvement.
Essentially, this discussion and indeed this asylum is immaterial. No one is ever going to do the necessary testing of components and wires and no one would pay any attention to them were they done.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Some psychologists think that if people cannot tell in a short duration test whether the component has changed or not, - Norm 17:15:12 06/03/06 (22)
- Those are the Hyundai buyers - E-Stat 16:44:48 06/05/06 (3)
- Re: Those are the Hyundai buyers - kerr 05:15:10 06/07/06 (2)
- I see you have your priorities correctly sorted out. [nt] - Wellfed 08:49:15 06/07/06 (1)
- Well, if not "correctly", at least "sorted" - kerr 09:50:15 06/07/06 (0)
- Who are you talking about.... - real_jj 11:58:26 06/05/06 (16)
- If the shoe fits wear it. - Norm 15:22:40 06/05/06 (15)
- You mean I'm Galileo, and you're the Pope - real_jj 18:04:40 06/05/06 (14)
- If the shoe fits wear it. - Norm 18:10:11 06/05/06 (13)
- Is there a reason you lie and accuse me of scientific misconduct? - real_jj 18:19:08 06/05/06 (12)
- Okay, let us followup on the professional accusation crap. Tell me how I do so? - Norm 20:25:36 06/05/06 (10)
- More lies on the part of "Norm" - real_jj 22:17:19 06/05/06 (0)
- Don't make things up, Norm. - real_jj 22:15:09 06/05/06 (8)
- Get real! File a complaint on your webpage??? - Norm 06:44:33 06/06/06 (7)
- Don't lie, Norm. - real_jj 08:11:24 06/06/06 (6)
- Don't exagerate. What is the secret? nt - Norm 10:26:56 06/06/06 (5)
- S**t or get off the pot, Norm. - real_jj 13:24:20 06/06/06 (4)
- I cannot understand your perceptions of the scientific method; perhaps ignorance - Norm 15:11:55 06/06/06 (3)
- Sorry, accusing me of "ignorance" about the scientific method is another professional accusation - real_jj 15:34:32 06/06/06 (2)
- If you say so. - Norm 18:14:16 06/06/06 (1)
- Please explain how I can discount, using evidence, inadvertant self-influence in a sighted test. - real_jj 18:29:26 06/06/06 (0)
- With only *two* posts thus far regarding accusations - E-Stat 19:44:10 06/05/06 (0)
- Amen Brother (NT) - Phil Tower 07:43:47 06/04/06 (0)