In Reply to: Why........ posted by JohnL on June 1, 2006 at 16:09:16:
You've been listening to too many subjectivists giving their take on what audio rationalists say, to wit, "All amplifiers sound the same." But that characterization is a rhetorical device made up to discredit opponents who in fact hold no such thing. In fact, no sensible person says that, particularly comparing tube and solid state amplifiers, which are quite likely to sound different.I'll give a fairly extreme example of a tube amplifier that very likely will sound different with most speakers. It depends a great deal on the output impedance of the amplifier (which varies with frequency) and the impedance curve of the speakers. Check the green curve in Figure 1 in the link below. This one is from Soundstage.com, but Stereophile does a similar measurement into a standard simulated speaker load. In many cases, the measurements provide very good reasons why they are likely to sound different.
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Only golden ears have closed minds -- all objective audiophiles started out as golden ears - Richard BassNut Greene 14:25:39 06/01/06 (159)
- I find it curious..... - Phil Tower 13:09:43 06/03/06 (98)
- You ignore the real issue -- no one else cares how you spend your money -- it's your advice that affects others - Richard BassNut Greene 14:36:10 06/05/06 (2)
- Re: You ignore the real issue -- no one else cares how you spend your money -- it's your advice that affects others - Phil Tower 16:19:04 06/05/06 (1)
- Eye Rack - Richard BassNut Greene 09:49:01 06/09/06 (0)
- Ah...the unproven long term listening excuse - Caymus 20:48:06 06/03/06 (26)
- Ear training - rditmars 08:53:27 06/05/06 (8)
- You’re confusing PITCH MEMORY with SOUND MEMORY - Caymus 14:31:02 06/05/06 (1)
- Re: You’re confusing PITCH MEMORY with SOUND MEMORY - rditmars 18:41:10 06/05/06 (0)
- Training - real_jj 11:53:12 06/05/06 (0)
- Re: Ear training - Dan Banquer 10:19:57 06/05/06 (4)
- You bet... - real_jj 12:12:37 06/05/06 (3)
- Re: You bet... - Dan Banquer 12:40:53 06/05/06 (2)
- Curiously enough... - real_jj 22:09:44 06/05/06 (1)
- Re: Curiously enough... - Dan Banquer 09:00:50 06/06/06 (0)
- Re: Ah...the unproven long term listening excuse - thetubeguy1954 08:09:24 06/05/06 (0)
- Proof is fleeting! - soulfood 07:43:36 06/04/06 (11)
- Why is so hard for some audiophiles to understand - Caymus 19:52:13 06/04/06 (1)
- There's a distinction between understanding and agreeing. - soulfood 09:24:25 06/05/06 (0)
- Re: Proof is fleeting! - Phil Tower 08:11:34 06/04/06 (8)
- Re: Proof is fleeting! - soulfood 08:27:45 06/04/06 (7)
- Re: Time is fleeting! - Madness Takes Control! - real_jj 12:00:30 06/05/06 (6)
- Wrong address, this is an 'audio' asylum. (nt) - soulfood 14:35:56 06/05/06 (5)
- It's astounding! - real_jj 18:17:26 06/05/06 (4)
- It may be too late. - soulfood 19:14:03 06/05/06 (3)
- Doctor! Who? - real_jj 22:10:10 06/05/06 (2)
- Whew! Welcome back. - soulfood 08:15:17 06/06/06 (1)
- I think it was the guy in the elevator... - real_jj 08:26:48 06/06/06 (0)
- Re: Ah...the unproven long term listening excuse - Phil Tower 07:41:05 06/04/06 (3)
- Err. AMEN - real_jj 12:01:40 06/05/06 (2)
- Re: Err. AMEN - Phil Tower 17:25:17 06/05/06 (1)
- Well, I do this for a living... - real_jj 12:36:32 06/06/06 (0)
- OMG he's back - Soundmind 14:42:33 06/03/06 (67)
- Some psychologists think that if people cannot tell in a short duration test whether the component has changed or not, - Norm 17:15:12 06/03/06 (22)
- Those are the Hyundai buyers - E-Stat 16:44:48 06/05/06 (3)
- Re: Those are the Hyundai buyers - kerr 05:15:10 06/07/06 (2)
- I see you have your priorities correctly sorted out. [nt] - Wellfed 08:49:15 06/07/06 (1)
- Well, if not "correctly", at least "sorted" - kerr 09:50:15 06/07/06 (0)
- Who are you talking about.... - real_jj 11:58:26 06/05/06 (16)
- If the shoe fits wear it. - Norm 15:22:40 06/05/06 (15)
- You mean I'm Galileo, and you're the Pope - real_jj 18:04:40 06/05/06 (14)
- If the shoe fits wear it. - Norm 18:10:11 06/05/06 (13)
- Is there a reason you lie and accuse me of scientific misconduct? - real_jj 18:19:08 06/05/06 (12)
- Okay, let us followup on the professional accusation crap. Tell me how I do so? - Norm 20:25:36 06/05/06 (10)
- More lies on the part of "Norm" - real_jj 22:17:19 06/05/06 (0)
- Don't make things up, Norm. - real_jj 22:15:09 06/05/06 (8)
- Get real! File a complaint on your webpage??? - Norm 06:44:33 06/06/06 (7)
- Don't lie, Norm. - real_jj 08:11:24 06/06/06 (6)
- Don't exagerate. What is the secret? nt - Norm 10:26:56 06/06/06 (5)
- S**t or get off the pot, Norm. - real_jj 13:24:20 06/06/06 (4)
- I cannot understand your perceptions of the scientific method; perhaps ignorance - Norm 15:11:55 06/06/06 (3)
- Sorry, accusing me of "ignorance" about the scientific method is another professional accusation - real_jj 15:34:32 06/06/06 (2)
- If you say so. - Norm 18:14:16 06/06/06 (1)
- Please explain how I can discount, using evidence, inadvertant self-influence in a sighted test. - real_jj 18:29:26 06/06/06 (0)
- With only *two* posts thus far regarding accusations - E-Stat 19:44:10 06/05/06 (0)
- Amen Brother (NT) - Phil Tower 07:43:47 06/04/06 (0)
- Re: OMG he's back - Phil Tower 16:51:47 06/03/06 (7)
- A lawyer who rejects scientific methods is.... - Soundmind 17:47:37 06/03/06 (6)
- Re: A lawyer who rejects scientific methods is.... - Phil Tower 08:05:32 06/04/06 (4)
- Re: A lawyer who rejects scientific methods is.... - Soundmind 08:27:30 06/04/06 (3)
- Re: A lawyer who rejects scientific methods is.... - Phil Tower 08:47:10 06/04/06 (2)
- Re: A lawyer who rejects scientific methods is.... - Soundmind 10:05:15 06/04/06 (1)
- Re: A lawyer who rejects scientific methods is.... - Phil Tower 14:30:38 06/04/06 (0)
- Re: "You seem to be a congenital arguer." - geoffkait 04:55:32 06/04/06 (0)
- Re: OMG he's back - rditmars 16:45:42 06/03/06 (35)
- DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt - Soundmind 17:49:20 06/03/06 (34)
- Re: DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt - okiemax 20:02:29 06/03/06 (33)
- Re: DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt - Soundmind 00:49:01 06/04/06 (32)
- Re: DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt - Phil Tower 08:27:56 06/04/06 (27)
- Re: DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt - Soundmind 08:39:06 06/04/06 (26)
- Re: DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt - Phil Tower 15:19:09 06/04/06 (0)
- What I believe (very long post) - Phil Tower 15:07:57 06/04/06 (24)
- You call that a long post? Risch once had one on AR which took 9 boards...and said nothing...as usual ;-) nt - Soundmind 17:19:13 06/04/06 (21)
- Don't get me started on Risch. That's when I really start to get myself in trouble around here. (NT) - Phil Tower 20:08:24 06/04/06 (20)
- You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Soundmind 11:23:05 06/05/06 (19)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Phil Tower 17:03:19 06/05/06 (13)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Pat D 20:29:47 06/05/06 (7)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Phil Tower 20:44:57 06/05/06 (6)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Soundmind 06:25:36 06/06/06 (5)
- Um, was that the fallacy of the excluded middle, soundmind? - real_jj 12:37:52 06/06/06 (3)
- you are absolutely correct - Soundmind 16:07:49 06/06/06 (2)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Phil Tower 10:17:43 06/06/06 (0)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Soundmind 18:00:02 06/05/06 (4)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Phil Tower 18:24:13 06/05/06 (1)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Soundmind 18:46:42 06/05/06 (0)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Soundmind 18:14:48 06/05/06 (1)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - john curl 10:58:53 06/09/06 (0)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Phil Tower 16:25:47 06/05/06 (4)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Soundmind 17:50:54 06/05/06 (3)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Phil Tower 18:12:50 06/05/06 (2)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Soundmind 18:39:36 06/05/06 (1)
- Re: You mean you really don't see eye to eye with Jon Risch? - Phil Tower 20:51:12 06/05/06 (0)
- Re: What I believe (very long post) - Soundmind 16:11:57 06/04/06 (1)
- Re: What I believe (very long post) - Phil Tower 20:05:52 06/04/06 (0)
- Re: DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt - okiemax 01:51:58 06/04/06 (3)
- Re: DBTs don't have any time limits...except for the patience of the guy conducting it. All it has to be is fair. nt - Soundmind 07:50:06 06/04/06 (2)
- My point : number of trials should be specified before a DBT begins - okiemax 09:57:26 06/04/06 (1)
- Why should the number of trials should be specified before a DBT begins? - Soundmind 15:49:07 06/05/06 (0)
- Re: Only golden ears have closed minds -- all objective audiophiles started out as golden ears - Todd Krieger 16:05:11 06/02/06 (2)
- Re: Only golden ears have closed minds -- all objective audiophiles started out as golden ears - tomservo 06:54:43 06/03/06 (0)
- He has that bass ackwards - E-Stat 06:03:36 06/03/06 (0)
- If golden ears spawned objective audiophiles then gratitude is another fantasy world. (nt) - soulfood 15:16:53 06/02/06 (0)
- Re: Only golden ears have closed minds -- all objective audiophiles started out as golden ears - Awe-d-o-file 14:10:31 06/02/06 (1)
- I forgot to say that I think spending 10X as much $ doesn't even sound 2X better but still "worth" it....... - Awe-d-o-file 14:43:14 06/02/06 (0)
- "glittering generalities" - unclestu52 13:50:11 06/02/06 (2)
- I think you miss the satire in RBNG's post. - Pat D 18:06:12 06/02/06 (1)
- Re: I think you miss the satire in Stu's post. (NT) - unclestu52 20:05:32 06/02/06 (0)
- A place for everything and everything in it's place! - Bruce Kendall 11:27:32 06/02/06 (0)
- Mr. Nut's latest troll - take it to PropHead...(nt) - mkuller 14:28:52 06/01/06 (20)
- Typical, Mkuller, have you any evidence? - real_jj 11:15:28 06/02/06 (4)
- Show us YOUR evidence - got any? (nt) - mkuller 11:55:46 06/02/06 (3)
- Don't need to. You make the claim, you do the research... - real_jj 13:45:57 06/02/06 (2)
- Do you even know... - mkuller 12:02:54 06/04/06 (1)
- Where's your evidence? - real_jj 23:02:57 06/04/06 (0)
- Please tell about your sample size. This certainly runs counter to my experience. - Norm 14:48:01 06/01/06 (19)
- Please don't assume your prejudices are true... - real_jj 11:17:30 06/02/06 (5)
- Have you ever known a subjectivist? - Norm 20:35:59 06/02/06 (1)
- Rather 100's of them, Norm... - real_jj 17:46:46 06/03/06 (0)
- Now we are confusing terms. - rditmars 11:28:44 06/02/06 (2)
- Um, where IS the measurement only crowd? - real_jj 13:49:02 06/02/06 (1)
- Good question... - rditmars 14:13:21 06/02/06 (0)
- I was an objectivist who turned golden ear. - SalD 15:32:50 06/01/06 (3)
- Re: Only golden ears have closed minds -- all objective audiophiles started out as golden ears - Audioq 16:06:32 06/01/06 (11)
- Why........ - JohnL 16:09:16 06/01/06 (4)
- Wrong.............. - JohnL 06:33:40 06/03/06 (0)
- Tube amps often do sound different. - Pat D 17:22:17 06/02/06 (0)
- You do - kavakidd 16:25:03 06/01/06 (0)
- Objectivists are alchemists? they can turn gold into tin? nt - Analog Scott 17:39:15 06/01/06 (0)
- A open mind is not subjective or objective but a little of both - Kloss 08:14:52 06/02/06 (1)
- Re: A open mind is not subjective or objective but a little of both - thetubeguy1954 10:08:56 06/02/06 (0)
Follow Ups
- Tube amps often do sound different. - Pat D 17:22:17 06/02/06 (0)