In Reply to: Okay, let us followup on the professional accusation crap. Tell me how I do so? posted by Norm on June 5, 2006 at 20:25:36:
You say: I think you really believe that what little research there is using DBT gives us all we need to know in audio.I said, a few articles removed from this: I have said specifically that I do not audition equipment for purchase blind. Hello? Hey, you can have the best sounding amplifier in the world, but if it's 1000x your budget, and has flashing purple and green searchlights built into it, you ain't gonnna buy it, are you? (The examples are extreme, but the point isn't. Things like the maker's name, knowlege of reliability, appearance, DO matter, don't they, now?)
in http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/prophead/messages/18977.htmlYou can click on the right link from my web page to find out how to file a formal complaint.
S**T or get off the pot.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Don't make things up, Norm. - real_jj 22:15:09 06/05/06 (8)
- Get real! File a complaint on your webpage??? - Norm 06:44:33 06/06/06 (7)
- Don't lie, Norm. - real_jj 08:11:24 06/06/06 (6)
- Don't exagerate. What is the secret? nt - Norm 10:26:56 06/06/06 (5)
- S**t or get off the pot, Norm. - real_jj 13:24:20 06/06/06 (4)
- I cannot understand your perceptions of the scientific method; perhaps ignorance - Norm 15:11:55 06/06/06 (3)
- Sorry, accusing me of "ignorance" about the scientific method is another professional accusation - real_jj 15:34:32 06/06/06 (2)
- If you say so. - Norm 18:14:16 06/06/06 (1)
- Please explain how I can discount, using evidence, inadvertant self-influence in a sighted test. - real_jj 18:29:26 06/06/06 (0)