In Reply to: Re: Faithful reproduction is a fluid perceptual reality. posted by Don T on November 23, 2006 at 06:49:25:
["This is a mature technology not something underdevelopment. IMO for all practical purposes the technology far surpassed the potential of the format long ago."]Relative to current technology, science fiction is not real.
[The quest for faithful reproduction is a noble one.
"What exactly does this mean?"]Faithful reproduction is the original quest that spawned audiophiles.
[Why stand on and designate it as audio science?
"Depends on what "it" is."]"It", is fantasy. Standing on fantasies is perilous.
["For far and away most audiophiles (myself included) the objective use of realism is way too difficult a path to follow. But this doesn't precluded many of them from using it as a justification for their equipment purchases. Like anything else audio - it figures!"]
Realism is not difficult, it's a sure path to fantasy. As such, subsequent equipment purchases reinforces notions I find unstable. Saying, "it figures", is another way of resigning to the acceptance of a phantom directive.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Faithful reproduction is a fluid perceptual reality. - soulfood 08:31:23 11/23/06 (10)
- Re: Faithful reproduction is a fluid perceptual reality. - Don T 09:16:51 11/23/06 (9)
- Re: Faithful reproduction is a fluid perceptual reality. - soulfood 20:42:08 11/23/06 (8)
- Step up! - Don T 09:38:00 11/24/06 (7)
- Pay attention! - soulfood 10:29:16 11/24/06 (6)
- Step up! - Don T 22:22:52 11/24/06 (5)
- Stepped in! - soulfood 08:45:24 11/25/06 (4)
- Faithful reproduction is a fluid perceptual reality = fantasy = yank BS! - Don T 06:56:26 11/26/06 (3)
- Your evolving perceptions are reality. - soulfood 10:41:28 11/26/06 (2)
- Yea so what's that got to do with faithful reproduction? - Don T 05:43:24 12/02/06 (1)
- Re: Yea so what's that got to do with faithful reproduction? - soulfood 19:30:14 12/04/06 (0)