In Reply to: You're Blinded By Believing The Science Being Used Reveal Everything! posted by thetubeguy1954 on June 23, 2006 at 13:10:24:
One thing scientists can test for is whether or not two different things sound the same to the point where people can reliably distinguish them. The reason scientists haven't pursued this science of sound recording and reproduction at a basic level is that most real scientists frankly don't give a damn about it, the problem isn't interesting to them. There's also no big money in it for them. That leaves it to audio engineers to take up the yoke and quite honestly, they don't seem to apply much effort to pull the weight. It's easier to just plod down the same old ruts they are used to. Don't believe it? I've suggested to John Curl twice that he develop measurements which correlate to what he hears since he says the ones he can make don't work for him. So far I've gotten no reply. It's a lot easier and more fun to just keep experimenting with new amplifier and preamplifier topologies. More profitable too.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: You're Blinded By Believing The Science Being Used Reveal Everything! - Soundmind 14:35:50 06/23/06 (5)
- Re: You're Blinded By Believing The Science Being Used Reveal Everything! - Todd Krieger 14:45:49 06/23/06 (4)
- We just went through this nonsense with Cheever's weighting of harmonic distortion components ad nauseum - Soundmind 15:48:57 06/23/06 (3)
- Re: We just went through this nonsense with Cheever's weighting of harmonic distortion components ad nauseum - john curl 20:33:33 06/23/06 (2)
- Hey, John, why not look up "PEAQ"? - real_jj 11:16:18 07/10/06 (0)
- You can reinvent the wheel a million different ways Mr. Curl but it's not going to get any rounder - Soundmind 04:16:13 06/24/06 (0)