Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

"It still remains that sighted listening is less reliable than controlled DBTs." That's an assertion; or is there proof?

208.58.2.83

Testing 1...2...3... Testing 1...2...3...

This message was removed yesterday with all attendant responses. Not shifted to another forum, but REMOVED.

I've been asked why, and I do not know.

The original remains in place (pointed to below); mine was merely the response, two days later. Several times I've seen this done.

I still have all the subsequent messages from Geoff Kait, Chris F, Caymus, RGA, Inmate 51, Bambi B, kerr and David Aiken. Surprisingly few were combative or rude. A good discussion was in progress. What was wrong?

So, Testing 1...2...3...

Will this simply be removed to, or will the moderator see fit to enlighten us as to what's allowed and what not?

clark

From one poster:

Clark,

I could swear that I saw a post from you earlier today starting a new
thread about our ongoing DBT testing saga, and I could also swear
that I actually posted a reply to mkuller's reply, and now the whole
thread seems gone. Not only that, nothing shows up if I use the
search engine...

Have you any idea what happened?




This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Sonic Craft  


Topic - "It still remains that sighted listening is less reliable than controlled DBTs." That's an assertion; or is there proof? - clarkjohnsen 09:10:14 12/21/05 (162)


You can not post to an archived thread.