In Reply to: Come on bjh why suddenly are you attempting to take on the subjectivist side of the argument? posted by Don T on October 17, 2005 at 13:06:20:
when *I* pointed out the ill aspects of Austin's invoking DBT as the sole legitimate arbiter of sonic differences in audio (ignoring or ignorant of the history of DBT in audio), and also of the wrongheadedness of his subtle differences arguement (due to lack of experience/interest?), the later not only incorrect but exploitable to support the *high-end=wishful thinking* bung such as you preach incessantly.So again was I being subjectivist when I made those observations?, was I being objectivist?, what does classification as one or the other have to do with it? You're simply confused! The fact that you apparently can't even remember what observations were made by whom only demonstrates that further.
As far as classification goes that you are a *nut* is the only one I am reasonable certain of.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Oh was I something other than subjectivist ... - bjh 13:54:17 10/17/05 (3)
- LOL! The race card again? - Don T 19:51:28 10/17/05 (2)
- For my last words I'll defer to a master, after which, suit yourself ... - bjh 20:02:11 10/17/05 (1)
- What you got a headache? nt - Don T 20:08:46 10/17/05 (0)