In Reply to: This one's easy. posted by Jim Austin on October 15, 2005 at 08:40:25:
Screw that Jim you've clearly put yourself and helped corner the magazine you write for into the selectively objective camp. It's not a good place to be in the long run as the suckling helpless will wake up one morning with a clue to find you both hypocritical and useless just like I have. I'm expecting lots more iPod, vintage, and low cost from Stereophile as they further emulate WalMarts formula for success.Good job!
Give me rhythm or give me death!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- uh ha - Don T 15:12:51 10/15/05 (40)
- You've made my point for me DonT - Jim Austin 15:13:55 10/15/05 (39)
- Sorry Jim but... - Don T 22:04:13 10/15/05 (38)
- Re: Sorry Jim but... - john curl 08:57:22 10/18/05 (7)
- Re: Sorry Jim but... - rcrump 16:22:55 10/20/05 (6)
- Re: Sorry Jim but... - john curl 07:47:21 10/21/05 (2)
- Re: Let's join the Republican Party instead! (nt) - rcrump 11:22:30 10/21/05 (1)
- Woah! That's one high priced tweak! ;-) nt - Ivan303 14:09:15 10/28/05 (0)
- Re: Sorry Jim but... - soulfood 04:45:37 10/21/05 (2)
- Re: Sorry Jim but... - rcrump 11:19:37 10/21/05 (1)
- Re: Sorry Jim but... - soulfood 13:30:36 10/21/05 (0)
- Re: Sorry Jim but...'the guys who are tagging you as the scientific objectivist are the guys who are in the middle of th - Lynn 17:54:35 10/16/05 (29)
- Re: Sorry Jim but...'the guys who are tagging you as the scientific objectivist are the guys who are in the middle of th - Don T 19:45:03 10/16/05 (28)
- Re: Sorry Jim but...'the guys who are tagging you as the scientific objectivist are the guys who are in the middle of th - Lynn 21:59:26 10/16/05 (23)
- The race card? You've got to be kidding me! - Don T 23:33:22 10/16/05 (22)
- Blinded by bias ... - bjh 07:41:34 10/17/05 (17)
- Re: Blinded by bias ... - Don T 08:27:01 10/17/05 (16)
- It's OK, clearly you can't be wrong, your pseudo-intellectual bias won't allow. LOL nt - bjh 08:36:01 10/17/05 (15)
- Re: It's OK, clearly you can't be wrong, your pseudo-intellectual bias won't allow. LOL nt - john curl 13:43:50 10/18/05 (6)
- Shouldn't you be busy ... - bjh 17:29:53 10/18/05 (5)
- Re: Shouldn't you be busy ... - john curl 17:40:25 10/18/05 (4)
- I honestly never recall you asking before ... - bjh 18:02:01 10/18/05 (3)
- Re: I honestly never recall you asking before ... - john curl 18:12:16 10/18/05 (2)
- I answered! Are you daft? nt - bjh 18:14:56 10/18/05 (1)
- Re: I answered! Are you daft? nt - john curl 22:55:17 10/18/05 (0)
- Come on bjh why suddenly are you attempting to take on the subjectivist side of the argument? - Don T 13:06:20 10/17/05 (7)
- Re: Come on bjh why suddenly are you attempting to take on the subjectivist side of the argument? - morricab 01:52:57 10/20/05 (2)
- Ok I read it - Don T 21:45:04 10/20/05 (1)
- Re: Ok I read it - morricab 05:10:56 10/24/05 (0)
- Oh was I something other than subjectivist ... - bjh 13:54:17 10/17/05 (3)
- LOL! The race card again? - Don T 19:51:28 10/17/05 (2)
- For my last words I'll defer to a master, after which, suit yourself ... - bjh 20:02:11 10/17/05 (1)
- What you got a headache? nt - Don T 20:08:46 10/17/05 (0)
- What??? The race card? Who brought that up? - Lynn 07:15:01 10/17/05 (3)
- Get off it! - Don T 08:05:10 10/17/05 (1)
- Re: Get off it! - Tom Dawson 08:46:11 10/17/05 (0)
- Agreed! - bjh 07:54:15 10/17/05 (0)
- Give an inch, takes a pulpit! (does that mean threat to cancel subscription is on again, never quite sure!) nt - bjh 20:30:23 10/16/05 (3)
- interesting? - Don T 21:49:34 10/16/05 (2)
- Sorry about that should have said ... - bjh 23:12:21 10/16/05 (1)
- . - Don T 23:54:00 10/16/05 (0)