In Reply to: Re: Sorry Jim but...'the guys who are tagging you as the scientific objectivist are the guys who are in the middle of th posted by Lynn on October 16, 2005 at 21:59:26:
>>I really was interested in the rules you used to categorize
>>people.
Really now, I already told you that I think the kind of labelling you used was bs when you originally asked me. Was it your plan to hit me with that bomb once I had attempted to respond to your query? And when I dismissed your query as bs out of hand were you so excited with your anticipated retort that you decided to drop it anyway figuring you'll surrounded with words to make it looks like it still fits?>>Ok, you (and others) are upset with IC article and dismissing the
>>IC out of hand. I can understand your point, and to some degree I
>>sympathize
To some degree? How much selective objectivism is acceptable to you when reading a subjectivists magazine? We never read "it's a good product but I would never buy it because this and that is so much better at the price point". We read "it's a great product" and see these products end up in RCLs even though reviewers have never and would never own them themselves. I understand it and I can live with it but given that consideration I have no/zero tolerance for subjective objectivism - none. What makes you think it's not being applied in the rare case when we see a bad/poor/negative review?As far as the rest of your comments go they seem to make sense.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The race card? You've got to be kidding me! - Don T 23:33:22 10/16/05 (22)
- Blinded by bias ... - bjh 07:41:34 10/17/05 (17)
- Re: Blinded by bias ... - Don T 08:27:01 10/17/05 (16)
- It's OK, clearly you can't be wrong, your pseudo-intellectual bias won't allow. LOL nt - bjh 08:36:01 10/17/05 (15)
- Re: It's OK, clearly you can't be wrong, your pseudo-intellectual bias won't allow. LOL nt - john curl 13:43:50 10/18/05 (6)
- Shouldn't you be busy ... - bjh 17:29:53 10/18/05 (5)
- Re: Shouldn't you be busy ... - john curl 17:40:25 10/18/05 (4)
- I honestly never recall you asking before ... - bjh 18:02:01 10/18/05 (3)
- Re: I honestly never recall you asking before ... - john curl 18:12:16 10/18/05 (2)
- I answered! Are you daft? nt - bjh 18:14:56 10/18/05 (1)
- Re: I answered! Are you daft? nt - john curl 22:55:17 10/18/05 (0)
- Come on bjh why suddenly are you attempting to take on the subjectivist side of the argument? - Don T 13:06:20 10/17/05 (7)
- Re: Come on bjh why suddenly are you attempting to take on the subjectivist side of the argument? - morricab 01:52:57 10/20/05 (2)
- Ok I read it - Don T 21:45:04 10/20/05 (1)
- Re: Ok I read it - morricab 05:10:56 10/24/05 (0)
- Oh was I something other than subjectivist ... - bjh 13:54:17 10/17/05 (3)
- LOL! The race card again? - Don T 19:51:28 10/17/05 (2)
- For my last words I'll defer to a master, after which, suit yourself ... - bjh 20:02:11 10/17/05 (1)
- What you got a headache? nt - Don T 20:08:46 10/17/05 (0)
- What??? The race card? Who brought that up? - Lynn 07:15:01 10/17/05 (3)
- Get off it! - Don T 08:05:10 10/17/05 (1)
- Re: Get off it! - Tom Dawson 08:46:11 10/17/05 (0)
- Agreed! - bjh 07:54:15 10/17/05 (0)