In Reply to: Frustration posted by Phil Tower on January 14, 2004 at 08:47:54:
You are not alone. You learn more here about the obnoxious sides of debating than about any science in audio. Very few believe that science is relevant to audio, since they have a good while back decided that more fun was to be had in being a "subjective" audio enthusiast.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Frustration - middleground 07:16:17 01/16/04 (14)
- Re: Frustration - Phil Tower 11:30:55 01/16/04 (0)
- "Very few believe that science is relevant to audio" - Robert Hamel 09:17:36 01/16/04 (12)
- Re: "Very few believe that science is relevant to audio" - chris_w 16:11:58 01/18/04 (0)
- "Without good engineering/science basics you just can't get there meaning decent sound." LOL! - clarkjohnsen 00:23:22 01/17/04 (8)
- Yes and I stand by it we are talking reproduction through electronic media. Go read the posts next time. nt - Robert Hamel 19:10:03 01/17/04 (6)
- Oh, sorry. I didn't read the posts, huh? Boy, you sure are smart... Much smarter than most everyone... nt - clarkjohnsen 18:09:06 01/18/04 (5)
- Thanks nt. - Robert Hamel 19:37:53 01/18/04 (4)
- Can I have your autograph? (nt) - Richard BassNut Greene 10:33:46 01/20/04 (3)
- Rob...Send him.....THE PICTURE (nt) - jneutron 11:12:28 01/20/04 (2)
- I didn't realize you had such a mean streak! nt. - Robert Hamel 12:04:19 01/21/04 (1)
- must be the balls in the basement...but dey ain't brass nt - jneutron 12:57:24 01/21/04 (0)
- Re: "Without good engineering/science basics you just can't get there meaning decent sound." LOL! - Dan Banquer 04:22:30 01/17/04 (0)
- Absolutely! - Commuteman 10:33:02 01/16/04 (0)
- Re: "Very few believe that science is relevant to audio" - Dan Banquer 09:39:24 01/16/04 (0)