In Reply to: I disagree with Roger Sanders' claim posted by robertopisa on January 1, 2007 at 02:07:13:
Whenever the terms "well-made", "well-designed", or "properly-designed" is brought forth in a premise, such ideal has never had defined standards for qualification. Or anything even remotely close to that. It's purely a subjective prejudgment.So using such basis to claim that products ought to perform a **specific** way ("sounding identical") is purely conjecture. For it seems the only practical objective of such tactic is to enable citation of either delusions of "golden-ears" acuity or "improper design", depending on how obvious the sonic differences are. For the tactic really wouldn't be of use for anything else.
So the use of vague, unqualified terms such as "well-made", "well-designed", or "properly-designed" as a basis for an exacting performance ideal is indeed mysticism. Of maybe an even worse kind.
When this tactic is accompanied by scathing accusations of "audiophile mysticism", that dreaded "H" word.....
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "Well-Designed" Mysticism..... - Todd Krieger 01:38:50 01/05/07 (9)
- "Well-Designed" Mysticism..... - mkuller 13:29:13 01/05/07 (6)
- Re: "Well-Designed" Mysticism..... - Todd Krieger 05:45:01 01/06/07 (0)
- Re: "Well-Designed" Mysticism..... - jneutron 13:47:51 01/05/07 (4)
- I don't think so..... - mkuller 17:06:25 01/05/07 (3)
- Re: I don't think so..... - AJinFLA 08:08:48 01/06/07 (1)
- Circular logic or... - mkuller 12:06:59 01/06/07 (0)
- Re: I don't think so..... - jneutron 07:23:40 01/06/07 (0)
- "Well-Designed" = "Perfect" in their parlance, otherwise it makes no logical sense. - clarkjohnsen 08:57:19 01/05/07 (1)
- "Logical sense" from *those* who grind and ink the glare demons from CD's??? Umm. Yeah. Ok. (nt) - AJinFLA 10:37:36 01/06/07 (0)