|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: And more denial . posted by real_jj on May 22, 2006 at 07:42:52:
"Before you assert that DBT's are ' static and archaic scientific doctrine.' you get to prove that."I've never explicitly stated that DBTs were "static and archaic scientific doctrine." I stated that some people often demand subjective findings to conform to static and archaic scientific doctrine. Often by using a "one-size fits all" approach to evaluation that is **indeed** static. The proof is the belief that the application and/or tools are adequate, hence no improvement of the application/tools is necessary.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: And more denial . - Todd Krieger 13:09:47 05/22/06 (3)
- They why did you insinuate that they were? - real_jj 14:41:19 05/22/06 (2)
- I Didn't Insinuate That...... - Todd Krieger 18:27:04 05/22/06 (1)
- Oh, you deny you said those words in that context, then? - real_jj 20:49:37 05/22/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
