I was told by two different people that using vastly over-specced power transformers in a source component power supply - ie. t/table power supply/preamp/phono stage/crossover - is a good thing; it gives more "weight"/"body" to the sound.This is hard to believe as it does not follow the "maths/theory" but I recently lashed out and spent US$70 on a pair of Antrim 15-0-15v, 160VA toroids (and a day's work!), to replace the 30VA toroids which I had used for my active crossovers.
As each (mono, 3-way) crossover only draws less than 100ma, I had assumed that the 30VA toroids - which can supply 1 amp - were more than adequate.
However, after replacing them with 160VA toroids (which can deliver 5.3 amps), I find that the people I talked to were correct!! The resulting sound from my speakers does indeed have more "substance". Amaaazing!!
So I recommend this move! The theory is along the lines of there being a much lower flux density in the toroids, during the charging cycle. As toroids are typically built to minimal "flux-density-headroom", under-stressing them delivers a sonic benefit.
Regards,
Andy
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Using larger power transformers in low power-draw source components - andyr 02:34:54 06/21/04 (37)
- Pretty simple really.... - Sean 20:13:57 06/21/04 (18)
- Thanks, Sean ... - andyr 20:52:25 06/21/04 (17)
- Re: Thanks, Sean ... - Sean 21:09:08 06/21/04 (16)
- Re: Thanks, Sean ... - miklos 17:23:57 06/26/04 (0)
- Isn't it interesting that toroids are perceived as good? - Commuteman 09:19:20 06/22/04 (14)
- Re: Isn't it interesting that toroids are perceived as good? - Dan Banquer 17:35:19 06/22/04 (13)
- Re: toroids are perceived as good? - Sean 00:13:27 06/23/04 (12)
- Re: toroids are perceived as good? - Dan Banquer 03:20:19 06/23/04 (11)
- Re: toroids are perceived as good? - Sean 08:56:29 06/23/04 (10)
- Re: toroids are perceived as good? - Dan Banquer 10:10:01 06/23/04 (9)
- I think it's a fairly simple idea - Commuteman 16:52:04 06/23/04 (8)
- Thanks for summing things up (nt) - Sean 20:09:20 06/23/04 (0)
- Re: I think it's a fairly simple idea - Dan Banquer 17:48:04 06/23/04 (6)
- So it's a tradeoof, like everything else.... - Commuteman 08:31:23 06/24/04 (2)
- Re: So it's a tradeoof, like everything else.... - Dan Banquer 08:40:44 06/24/04 (1)
- That's another one of those slippery slope things.... - Commuteman 09:11:43 06/25/04 (0)
- Re: I think it's a fairly simple idea - Sean 20:08:03 06/23/04 (2)
- Re: I think it's a fairly simple idea - Dan Banquer 05:42:01 06/24/04 (1)
- You've just proven my point.... - Sean 08:07:14 06/24/04 (0)
- Faraday's law sez you're increasing the wrong rating - jcox 19:16:41 06/21/04 (2)
- just ask for a reduced Bmax core/winding combination - jcox 07:58:14 06/22/04 (0)
- Thanks, jcox, for your input ... - andyr 19:44:07 06/21/04 (0)
- Re: Using larger power transformers in low power-draw source components - Dan Banquer 07:11:23 06/21/04 (14)
- This is the kind of answer I was hoping for, Dan ... - andyr 20:54:38 06/21/04 (3)
- Re: This is the kind of answer I was hoping for, Dan ... - Dan Banquer 06:26:30 06/22/04 (2)
- Thanks, Dan, ... - andyr 14:00:36 06/22/04 (1)
- Re: Thanks, Dan, ... - Dan Banquer 17:32:42 06/22/04 (0)
- Re: Using larger power transformers in low power-draw source components - andyr 14:06:25 06/21/04 (9)
- Re: Using larger power transformers in low power-draw source components - Dan Banquer 15:50:08 06/21/04 (8)
- Re: Using larger power transformers in low power-draw source components - andyr 16:07:34 06/21/04 (7)
- Re: Using larger power transformers in low power-draw source components - Dan Banquer 17:45:53 06/21/04 (6)
- Re: Using larger power transformers in low power-draw source components - andyr 19:24:59 06/21/04 (5)
- You might also try other types of transformers - Commuteman 13:50:29 06/22/04 (4)
- Good suggestion - Sean 00:18:46 06/23/04 (2)
- Shirley that's the whole point of this and the other AA Forums?? - andyr 02:25:20 06/23/04 (1)
- Re: Don't call him Shirley !!!!!! NT - slope 08:30:27 06/23/04 (0)
- Thanks, Peter, I will investigate. (nt) - andyr 14:04:39 06/22/04 (0)