Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - You guys are good... - Wellfed 09:02:17 06/24/06 (66)

• Here’s one fallacy imaginative audiophiles like Welfed SHOULD read - Caymus 14:50:25 06/26/06 (8)
• All the proof I need is obtained through direct observation... - Wellfed 17:48:09 06/26/06 (7)
• You also made an obvious Relativist Fallacy! - Caymus 18:45:17 06/26/06 (0)
• Sorry, but observation is NOT proof - Caymus 18:24:08 06/26/06 (5)
• In order to appease your delicate sensibilities, allow me to re-phrase then... - Wellfed 19:49:45 06/26/06 (4)
• I don't think you get it yet - Caymus 20:08:58 06/26/06 (3)
• You're starting to scare me... - Wellfed 20:31:53 06/26/06 (2)
• Huh? And you accuse others for infantile responses (nt) - Caymus 21:18:27 06/26/06 (1)
• I was talking about... - Wellfed 22:13:57 06/26/06 (0)
• Re: You guys are good... - May Belt 06:46:29 06/25/06 (23)
• You have to be able to read and understand before you start ascribiing fallacies. - Pat D 20:22:34 06/25/06 (15)
• I'll let May Belt respond to you before commenting on this particular posting... - Wellfed 22:55:21 06/25/06 (14)
• Wonderful! – now THAT’S a classic example of a RED HERRING! - Caymus 14:05:55 06/26/06 (8)
• The sly Mr. Kafton?... - Wellfed 20:25:00 06/26/06 (6)
• Unless you’re Virtual Dynamics, keep God out of it! - Caymus 21:07:20 06/26/06 (5)
• It's not your views that I have issue with... - Wellfed 22:08:35 06/26/06 (4)
• Perhaps after seeing the behavior of believers... - real_jj 15:10:18 07/08/06 (2)
• Bigotry by any other name is still bigotry... - Wellfed 16:40:28 07/08/06 (1)
• trVth - real_jj 11:14:11 07/10/06 (0)
• And not just cynics, but *sneering* cynics who moreover have no sensa humor. Caymus to a T! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:17:25 06/27/06 (0)
• I disagree... - Wellfed 14:15:07 06/26/06 (0)
• Again, you have to understand what is being said. - Pat D 12:51:52 06/26/06 (1)
• I personally considered... - Wellfed 13:44:28 06/26/06 (0)
• Which fallacious argument does he use? Why, appeal to one's own ignorance! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:34:04 06/26/06 (0)
• Re: I'll let May Belt respond to you before commenting on this particular posting... - May Belt 08:55:15 06/26/06 (1)
• Those work too! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:34:46 06/26/06 (0)
• Looks like you’re trying to suppress all critical thinking - Caymus 14:25:03 06/25/06 (2)
• Re: Looks like you’re trying to suppress all critical thinking - May Belt 08:52:28 06/26/06 (0)
• And it looks to me that... - Wellfed 16:18:34 06/25/06 (0)
• Re: You guys are - tomservo 10:19:37 06/25/06 (1)
• Let us not forget that it is a two way street. Those who think there can be no effect hear no effect. nt - Norm 18:51:05 06/25/06 (0)
• Re: You guys are good... - Phil Tower 08:30:52 06/25/06 (1)
• Good points all. [nt] - Wellfed 12:27:00 06/25/06 (0)
• Re: Innunciator for the Supposed Dead... - geoffkait 13:46:06 06/24/06 (28)
• Useless information... - Wellfed 14:37:51 06/24/06 (1)
• Re: I thought this was Kramer - geoffkait 15:03:06 06/24/06 (0)
• Take a look at the phony science discussions at Randi’s site - Caymus 14:05:53 06/24/06 (25)
• Re: Question: - geoffkait 15:09:14 06/24/06 (24)
• What do you think now, Geoff Kait? - real_jj 00:07:41 06/26/06 (14)
• Re: What do you think now, Geoff Kait? - geoffkait 07:17:23 06/26/06 (13)
• Do tell... - real_jj 21:14:24 06/26/06 (12)
• Re: Good Points - geoffkait 07:36:26 06/27/06 (11)
• So, then, what's the flux? - real_jj 10:25:06 06/27/06 (10)
• Re: The flux - geoffkait 11:09:45 06/27/06 (9)
• Proof of your mechanism is in the evidence... - real_jj 10:41:09 06/28/06 (8)
• Re: Still not convinced? - geoffkait 12:58:28 06/28/06 (7)
• Where's your evidence? That's all it takes... - real_jj 14:16:14 06/28/06 (6)
• Re: Funny how you always... - geoffkait 17:28:19 06/28/06 (5)
• I spell "explanation" as well as you provide "evidence" - real_jj 21:31:47 06/28/06 (2)
• Re: If you refuse... - geoffkait 05:19:41 06/29/06 (1)
• So, you have no evidence. - real_jj 09:48:00 06/29/06 (1)
• Even funnier how you don't provide evidence. (nt) - Pat D 19:07:01 06/28/06 (1)
• Re: Sock! Bam! Pow! - geoffkait 02:49:28 06/29/06 (0)
• Do you need to be an accountant to detect that Nigerian offer as fraud? - Caymus 17:19:16 06/24/06 (7)
• Do we really NEED an objectivist to comment... - Wellfed 19:08:09 06/24/06 (6)
• Re: Do we really NEED an objectivist to comment... - Dan Banquer 07:41:52 06/26/06 (3)
• It appears you haven't noticed... - Wellfed 10:11:25 06/26/06 (2)
• Au Contraire.... I have noticed - Dan Banquer 10:17:29 06/26/06 (1)
• Not to mention human nature. [nt] - Wellfed 10:19:15 06/26/06 (0)
• Do you need to be ripped off by the Nigerians to detect fraud? - Caymus 19:39:30 06/24/06 (1)
• Which fallacious argument are you trying to use here? [nt] - Wellfed 20:07:33 06/24/06 (0)
• I'm not a moderator... - Wellfed 15:37:06 06/24/06 (0)
• And for those who can’t distinguish pseudoscience from legit science - Caymus 10:46:43 06/24/06 (1)
• Oh him... - Wellfed 13:24:46 06/24/06 (0)
• That's quite a good site actually - andy_c 09:26:30 06/24/06 (1)
• You're welcome. [nt] - Wellfed 10:12:39 06/24/06 (0)

Follow Ups

• Re: Sock! Bam! Pow! - geoffkait 02:49:28 06/29/06 (0)