In Reply to: Re: Do we really NEED an objectivist to comment... posted by Dan Banquer on June 26, 2006 at 07:41:52:
the BULK of discussion taking place at this Asylum does not address "Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics."
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - You guys are good... - Wellfed 09:02:17 06/24/06 (66)
- Here’s one fallacy imaginative audiophiles like Welfed SHOULD read - Caymus 14:50:25 06/26/06 (8)
- All the proof I need is obtained through direct observation... - Wellfed 17:48:09 06/26/06 (7)
- You also made an obvious Relativist Fallacy! - Caymus 18:45:17 06/26/06 (0)
- Sorry, but observation is NOT proof - Caymus 18:24:08 06/26/06 (5)
- In order to appease your delicate sensibilities, allow me to re-phrase then... - Wellfed 19:49:45 06/26/06 (4)
- I don't think you get it yet - Caymus 20:08:58 06/26/06 (3)
- You're starting to scare me... - Wellfed 20:31:53 06/26/06 (2)
- Huh? And you accuse others for infantile responses (nt) - Caymus 21:18:27 06/26/06 (1)
- I was talking about... - Wellfed 22:13:57 06/26/06 (0)
- Re: You guys are good... - May Belt 06:46:29 06/25/06 (23)
- You have to be able to read and understand before you start ascribiing fallacies. - Pat D 20:22:34 06/25/06 (15)
- I'll let May Belt respond to you before commenting on this particular posting... - Wellfed 22:55:21 06/25/06 (14)
- Wonderful! – now THAT’S a classic example of a RED HERRING! - Caymus 14:05:55 06/26/06 (8)
- The sly Mr. Kafton?... - Wellfed 20:25:00 06/26/06 (6)
- Unless you’re Virtual Dynamics, keep God out of it! - Caymus 21:07:20 06/26/06 (5)
- It's not your views that I have issue with... - Wellfed 22:08:35 06/26/06 (4)
- Perhaps after seeing the behavior of believers... - real_jj 15:10:18 07/08/06 (2)
- Bigotry by any other name is still bigotry... - Wellfed 16:40:28 07/08/06 (1)
- trVth - real_jj 11:14:11 07/10/06 (0)
- And not just cynics, but *sneering* cynics who moreover have no sensa humor. Caymus to a T! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:17:25 06/27/06 (0)
- I disagree... - Wellfed 14:15:07 06/26/06 (0)
- Again, you have to understand what is being said. - Pat D 12:51:52 06/26/06 (1)
- I personally considered... - Wellfed 13:44:28 06/26/06 (0)
- Which fallacious argument does he use? Why, appeal to one's own ignorance! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:34:04 06/26/06 (0)
- Re: I'll let May Belt respond to you before commenting on this particular posting... - May Belt 08:55:15 06/26/06 (1)
- Those work too! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:34:46 06/26/06 (0)
- Looks like you’re trying to suppress all critical thinking - Caymus 14:25:03 06/25/06 (2)
- Re: Looks like you’re trying to suppress all critical thinking - May Belt 08:52:28 06/26/06 (0)
- And it looks to me that... - Wellfed 16:18:34 06/25/06 (0)
- Re: You guys are - tomservo 10:19:37 06/25/06 (1)
- Let us not forget that it is a two way street. Those who think there can be no effect hear no effect. nt - Norm 18:51:05 06/25/06 (0)
- Re: You guys are good... - Phil Tower 08:30:52 06/25/06 (1)
- Good points all. [nt] - Wellfed 12:27:00 06/25/06 (0)
- Re: Innunciator for the Supposed Dead... - geoffkait 13:46:06 06/24/06 (28)
- Useless information... - Wellfed 14:37:51 06/24/06 (1)
- Re: I thought this was Kramer - geoffkait 15:03:06 06/24/06 (0)
- Take a look at the phony science discussions at Randi’s site - Caymus 14:05:53 06/24/06 (25)
- Re: Question: - geoffkait 15:09:14 06/24/06 (24)
- What do you think now, Geoff Kait? - real_jj 00:07:41 06/26/06 (14)
- Re: What do you think now, Geoff Kait? - geoffkait 07:17:23 06/26/06 (13)
- Do tell... - real_jj 21:14:24 06/26/06 (12)
- Re: Good Points - geoffkait 07:36:26 06/27/06 (11)
- So, then, what's the flux? - real_jj 10:25:06 06/27/06 (10)
- Re: The flux - geoffkait 11:09:45 06/27/06 (9)
- Proof of your mechanism is in the evidence... - real_jj 10:41:09 06/28/06 (8)
- Re: Still not convinced? - geoffkait 12:58:28 06/28/06 (7)
- Where's your evidence? That's all it takes... - real_jj 14:16:14 06/28/06 (6)
- Re: Funny how you always... - geoffkait 17:28:19 06/28/06 (5)
- I spell "explanation" as well as you provide "evidence" - real_jj 21:31:47 06/28/06 (2)
- Re: If you refuse... - geoffkait 05:19:41 06/29/06 (1)
- So, you have no evidence. - real_jj 09:48:00 06/29/06 (1)
- Even funnier how you don't provide evidence. (nt) - Pat D 19:07:01 06/28/06 (1)
- Re: Sock! Bam! Pow! - geoffkait 02:49:28 06/29/06 (0)
- Do you need to be an accountant to detect that Nigerian offer as fraud? - Caymus 17:19:16 06/24/06 (7)
- Do we really NEED an objectivist to comment... - Wellfed 19:08:09 06/24/06 (6)
- Re: Do we really NEED an objectivist to comment... - Dan Banquer 07:41:52 06/26/06 (3)
- It appears you haven't noticed... - Wellfed 10:11:25 06/26/06 (2)
- Au Contraire.... I have noticed - Dan Banquer 10:17:29 06/26/06 (1)
- Not to mention human nature. [nt] - Wellfed 10:19:15 06/26/06 (0)
- Do you need to be ripped off by the Nigerians to detect fraud? - Caymus 19:39:30 06/24/06 (1)
- Which fallacious argument are you trying to use here? [nt] - Wellfed 20:07:33 06/24/06 (0)
- I'm not a moderator... - Wellfed 15:37:06 06/24/06 (0)
- And for those who can’t distinguish pseudoscience from legit science - Caymus 10:46:43 06/24/06 (1)
- Oh him... - Wellfed 13:24:46 06/24/06 (0)
- That's quite a good site actually - andy_c 09:26:30 06/24/06 (1)
- You're welcome. [nt] - Wellfed 10:12:39 06/24/06 (0)
Follow Ups
- It appears you haven't noticed... - Wellfed 10:11:25 06/26/06 (2)
- Au Contraire.... I have noticed - Dan Banquer 10:17:29 06/26/06 (1)
- Not to mention human nature. [nt] - Wellfed 10:19:15 06/26/06 (0)