In Reply to: You have to be able to read and understand before you start ascribiing fallacies. posted by Pat D on June 25, 2006 at 20:22:34:
In the meantime, what fallacious argument type(s) does Caymus try discrediting Alan Kafton with in the thread I've linked to below?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I'll let May Belt respond to you before commenting on this particular posting... - Wellfed 22:55:21 06/25/06 (14)
- Wonderful! – now THAT’S a classic example of a RED HERRING! - Caymus 14:05:55 06/26/06 (8)
- The sly Mr. Kafton?... - Wellfed 20:25:00 06/26/06 (6)
- Unless you’re Virtual Dynamics, keep God out of it! - Caymus 21:07:20 06/26/06 (5)
- It's not your views that I have issue with... - Wellfed 22:08:35 06/26/06 (4)
- Perhaps after seeing the behavior of believers... - real_jj 15:10:18 07/08/06 (2)
- Bigotry by any other name is still bigotry... - Wellfed 16:40:28 07/08/06 (1)
- trVth - real_jj 11:14:11 07/10/06 (0)
- And not just cynics, but *sneering* cynics who moreover have no sensa humor. Caymus to a T! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:17:25 06/27/06 (0)
- I disagree... - Wellfed 14:15:07 06/26/06 (0)
- Again, you have to understand what is being said. - Pat D 12:51:52 06/26/06 (1)
- I personally considered... - Wellfed 13:44:28 06/26/06 (0)
- Which fallacious argument does he use? Why, appeal to one's own ignorance! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:34:04 06/26/06 (0)
- Re: I'll let May Belt respond to you before commenting on this particular posting... - May Belt 08:55:15 06/26/06 (1)
- Those work too! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:34:46 06/26/06 (0)