Re: Do we really NEED an objectivist to comment... - Dan Banquer

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - You guys are good... - Wellfed 09:02:17 06/24/06 (66)

Hereâ€™s one fallacy imaginative audiophiles like Welfed SHOULD read - Caymus 14:50:25 06/26/06 (8)

All the proof I need is obtained through direct observation... - Wellfed 17:48:09 06/26/06 (7)

You also made an obvious Relativist Fallacy! - Caymus 18:45:17 06/26/06 (0)

Sorry, but observation is NOT proof - Caymus 18:24:08 06/26/06 (5)

In order to appease your delicate sensibilities, allow me to re-phrase then... - Wellfed 19:49:45 06/26/06 (4)

I don't think you get it yet - Caymus 20:08:58 06/26/06 (3)

You're starting to scare me... - Wellfed 20:31:53 06/26/06 (2)

Huh? And you accuse others for infantile responses (nt) - Caymus 21:18:27 06/26/06 (1)

I was talking about... - Wellfed 22:13:57 06/26/06 (0)

Re: You guys are good... - May Belt 06:46:29 06/25/06 (23)

You have to be able to read and understand before you start ascribiing fallacies. - Pat D 20:22:34 06/25/06 (15)

I'll let May Belt respond to you before commenting on this particular posting... - Wellfed 22:55:21 06/25/06 (14)

Wonderful! â€“ now THATâ€™S a classic example of a RED HERRING! - Caymus 14:05:55 06/26/06 (8)

The sly Mr. Kafton?... - Wellfed 20:25:00 06/26/06 (6)

Unless youâ€™re Virtual Dynamics, keep God out of it! - Caymus 21:07:20 06/26/06 (5)

It's not your views that I have issue with... - Wellfed 22:08:35 06/26/06 (4)

Perhaps after seeing the behavior of believers... - real_jj 15:10:18 07/08/06 (2)

Bigotry by any other name is still bigotry... - Wellfed 16:40:28 07/08/06 (1)

trVth - real_jj 11:14:11 07/10/06 (0)

And not just cynics, but *sneering* cynics who moreover have no sensa humor. Caymus to a T! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:17:25 06/27/06 (0)

I disagree... - Wellfed 14:15:07 06/26/06 (0)

Again, you have to understand what is being said. - Pat D 12:51:52 06/26/06 (1)

I personally considered... - Wellfed 13:44:28 06/26/06 (0)

Which fallacious argument does he use? Why, appeal to one's own ignorance! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:34:04 06/26/06 (0)

Re: I'll let May Belt respond to you before commenting on this particular posting... - May Belt 08:55:15 06/26/06 (1)

Those work too! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:34:46 06/26/06 (0)

Looks like youâ€™re trying to suppress all critical thinking - Caymus 14:25:03 06/25/06 (2)

Re: Looks like youâ€™re trying to suppress all critical thinking - May Belt 08:52:28 06/26/06 (0)

And it looks to me that... - Wellfed 16:18:34 06/25/06 (0)

Re: You guys are - tomservo 10:19:37 06/25/06 (1)

Let us not forget that it is a two way street. Those who think there can be no effect hear no effect. nt - Norm 18:51:05 06/25/06 (0)

Re: You guys are good... - Phil Tower 08:30:52 06/25/06 (1)

Good points all. [nt] - Wellfed 12:27:00 06/25/06 (0)

Re: Innunciator for the Supposed Dead... - geoffkait 13:46:06 06/24/06 (28)

Useless information... - Wellfed 14:37:51 06/24/06 (1)

Re: I thought this was Kramer - geoffkait 15:03:06 06/24/06 (0)

Take a look at the phony science discussions at Randiâ€™s site - Caymus 14:05:53 06/24/06 (25)

Re: Question: - geoffkait 15:09:14 06/24/06 (24)

What do you think now, Geoff Kait? - real_jj 00:07:41 06/26/06 (14)

Re: What do you think now, Geoff Kait? - geoffkait 07:17:23 06/26/06 (13)

Do tell... - real_jj 21:14:24 06/26/06 (12)

Re: Good Points - geoffkait 07:36:26 06/27/06 (11)

So, then, what's the flux? - real_jj 10:25:06 06/27/06 (10)

Re: The flux - geoffkait 11:09:45 06/27/06 (9)

Proof of your mechanism is in the evidence... - real_jj 10:41:09 06/28/06 (8)

Re: Still not convinced? - geoffkait 12:58:28 06/28/06 (7)

Where's your evidence? That's all it takes... - real_jj 14:16:14 06/28/06 (6)

Re: Funny how you always... - geoffkait 17:28:19 06/28/06 (5)

I spell "explanation" as well as you provide "evidence" - real_jj 21:31:47 06/28/06 (2)

Re: If you refuse... - geoffkait 05:19:41 06/29/06 (1)

So, you have no evidence. - real_jj 09:48:00 06/29/06 (1)

Even funnier how you don't provide evidence. (nt) - Pat D 19:07:01 06/28/06 (1)

Re: Sock! Bam! Pow! - geoffkait 02:49:28 06/29/06 (0)

Do you need to be an accountant to detect that Nigerian offer as fraud? - Caymus 17:19:16 06/24/06 (7)

Do we really NEED an objectivist to comment... - Wellfed 19:08:09 06/24/06 (6)

Re: Do we really NEED an objectivist to comment... - Dan Banquer 07:41:52 06/26/06 (3)

It appears you haven't noticed... - Wellfed 10:11:25 06/26/06 (2)

Au Contraire.... I have noticed - Dan Banquer 10:17:29 06/26/06 (1)

Not to mention human nature. [nt] - Wellfed 10:19:15 06/26/06 (0)

Do you need to be ripped off by the Nigerians to detect fraud? - Caymus 19:39:30 06/24/06 (1)

Which fallacious argument are you trying to use here? [nt] - Wellfed 20:07:33 06/24/06 (0)

I'm not a moderator... - Wellfed 15:37:06 06/24/06 (0)

And for those who canâ€™t distinguish pseudoscience from legit science - Caymus 10:46:43 06/24/06 (1)

Oh him... - Wellfed 13:24:46 06/24/06 (0)

That's quite a good site actually - andy_c 09:26:30 06/24/06 (1)

You're welcome. [nt] - Wellfed 10:12:39 06/24/06 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Do we really NEED an objectivist to comment... - Dan Banquer 07:41:52 06/26/06 (3)

It appears you haven't noticed... - Wellfed 10:11:25 06/26/06 (2)

Au Contraire.... I have noticed - Dan Banquer 10:17:29 06/26/06 (1)

Not to mention human nature. [nt] - Wellfed 10:19:15 06/26/06 (0)